Cited by 11Qur’anic Interpretation StudiesIslamic Thought and Society StudiesIslamic Studies and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tradition, Reason, and Qur’anic Exegesis in the Modern Period: The Hermeneutics of Said Nursi

Çoruh, Hakan·2017·Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations

Abstract

Key figures in modernist Qur’an exegesis include Sayyid Ahmad Khan (d. 1898) and Muhammad ʿAbduh (d. 1905). This article presents the exegetical principles of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1877–1960), a Muslim thinker and a major twentieth-century Turkish scholar who is not necessarily to be labelled a ‘modernist’, on tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr (tradition-based exegesis) and tafsīr bi-al-raʾy (reason-based exegesis) with special reference to the views of early Muslim modernist thinkers. It particularly refers to Nursi’s work on uṣūl al-tafsīr, Muḥākamāt (Reasonings), and his one-volume commentary, Ishārāt al-iʿjāz (Signs of Inimitability), in order to understand his method of tafsīr. The purpose of the article is to place Nursi within the historical framework of Qur’an exegesis and it argues that, while there are some similarities between ʿAbduh and Nursi since the latter is influenced by the former, the methodological differences are clear. While ʿAbduh’s method is text-based, Nursi’s is based on kalām (Islamic theology). While ʿAbduh is critical of the classical style tafsīr and linguistic discussions in tafsīr, Nursi can be considered to be a modern representative of the Ottoman exegetical school and a follower in the way of al-Zamakhsharī (d. 538⁄1144), Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606⁄1210) and al-Bayḍāwī (d. 685/1286).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09596410.2017.1280915

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd M, 2004, Signs of Miraculousness: The Inimitability of the Qur’an’s Consiseness, 7
  2. Abdel Haleem M. A. S, 2004, The Qur’an
  3. ʿAbduh M., 1947, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ḥakīm al-mushtahir bi-ism Tafsīr al-Manār, 1
  4. Adams Charles C, 2010, Islam and Modernism. A Study of the Modern Reform Movement Inaugurated by Muḥammad ʿAbduh
  5. Albayrak I, 2004, Klāsik modernizmde Kur’ān’a yaklaşımlar
  6. Albayrak I, 2008, Journal of Islamic Studies, 47, 301
  7. Aydüz Davut, 2004, Tefsir Tarihi, Çeşitleri ve Konulu Tefsir
  8. Baljon J. M. S, 1961, Modern Muslim Koran Interpretation
  9. al-Bayhaqī Abū Bakr, 2003, Al-Jāmiʿ li-shuʿab al-īmān, 4
  10. al-Bayḍāwī, Anwār al-tanzīl wa-asrār al-taʾwīl, 1
  11. Beki Niyazi, 2008, Kur’ān’ın Yüksek ve Parlak Bir Tefsiri Risale-i Nur
  12. Beki Niyazi, 2010, Islamic University of Europe. Journal of Islamic Research, 5, 159
  13. Brown Daniel W, 1996, Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought
  14. Cündioğlu Dücane, 1999, İslamiyat, 2, 51
  15. Demirci Muhsin, 2003, Tefsir tarihi
  16. von Denffer Ahmad, 1994, Ulum al Qur’an
  17. Dhahabi M. H, Al-tafsīr wa-al-mufassirūn
  18. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359561.001.0001 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/09596410.2012.676781 · DOI
  20. Jansen J. J. G, 1974, The Interpretation of the Qur’an in Modern Egypt
  21. Koç M. A, 2012, Tefsir el Kitabı
  22. Mardin S, 1989, Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi
  23. Markham Ian S, 2009, Engaging with Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. A Model of Interfaith Dialogue
  24. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2004, Signs of Miraculousness: The Inimitability of the Qur’an’s Consiseness
  25. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2005, The Words: The Reconstruction of Islamic Belief and Thought
  26. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2007, The Letters: Epistles on Islamic Thought, Belief, and Life
  27. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2008, The Reasonings. A Key to Understanding the Qur’an’s Eloquence
  28. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2009, İşārātü’l-İ’cāz
  29. Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2009, Tarihçe-i Hayat
  30. Paçacı Mehmet, 2003, Islāmiyāt, 6, 85
  31. Paçacı Mehmet, 2007, İslāmī İlimler Dergisi, 2, 7
  32. Qattān Mannāʿ al-, Mabāḥith fi ʿulūm al-Qurʾān
  33. al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn, 1981, Mafātīḥ al-ghayb, 2
  34. Saeed A, 2005, Interpreting the Qur’an, 10.4324/9780203016770 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Saeed A, 2005, Encyclopedia of Religion, 7561
  36. Saeed A, 2008, The Qur’an: An Introduction, 10.4324/9780203938454 · DOI
  37. al-Ṭabarī Muḥammad ibn Jarīr, 2001, Jāmiʿ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān, 1
  38. Troll Christian W, 1978, Sayyid Ahmad Khan. A Reinterpretation of Muslim Theology
  39. Turner Colin, 2010, The Rays: Reflections on Islamic Belief, Thought, Worship, and Action, xiii
  40. Vahide Şükran, 2003, Islam at the Crossroads: On the Life and Thought of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, 1
  41. Wielandt Rotraud, 2002, Encyclopaedia of the Qur’ān, 124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Çoruh, H.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Çoruh, Hakan
Venue
Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations
Published
2017-01-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
85-104
ISSN
  • 0959-6410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9311
OpenAlex
W2587488458
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
Keywords
Said Nursi, Quranic exegesis, tafsir bi al-ra'y, usul al-tafsir, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, Islamic modernism, kalam, Islamic theology, al-Zamakhshari, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, al-Baydawi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review