The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tradition, Reason, and Qur’anic Exegesis in the Modern Period: The Hermeneutics of Said Nursi
Abstract
Key figures in modernist Qur’an exegesis include Sayyid Ahmad Khan (d. 1898) and Muhammad ʿAbduh (d. 1905). This article presents the exegetical principles of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1877–1960), a Muslim thinker and a major twentieth-century Turkish scholar who is not necessarily to be labelled a ‘modernist’, on tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr (tradition-based exegesis) and tafsīr bi-al-raʾy (reason-based exegesis) with special reference to the views of early Muslim modernist thinkers. It particularly refers to Nursi’s work on uṣūl al-tafsīr, Muḥākamāt (Reasonings), and his one-volume commentary, Ishārāt al-iʿjāz (Signs of Inimitability), in order to understand his method of tafsīr. The purpose of the article is to place Nursi within the historical framework of Qur’an exegesis and it argues that, while there are some similarities between ʿAbduh and Nursi since the latter is influenced by the former, the methodological differences are clear. While ʿAbduh’s method is text-based, Nursi’s is based on kalām (Islamic theology). While ʿAbduh is critical of the classical style tafsīr and linguistic discussions in tafsīr, Nursi can be considered to be a modern representative of the Ottoman exegetical school and a follower in the way of al-Zamakhsharī (d. 538⁄1144), Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606⁄1210) and al-Bayḍāwī (d. 685/1286).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interpreting the Qur'an in the light of isr¯ a'¯ ıliyy¯ at reports is considered under tradition-based exegesis ( tafs¯ ır bi-al-ma'th¯ ur ) (Çoruh 2017).”
From A New Hermeneutical Approach to the Qur'an with Special Reference to the Narrative of Prophet Yaḥyā (John the Baptist) in the Qur'an and the Bible (2022) · cites this paper as Çoruh 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd M, 2004, Signs of Miraculousness: The Inimitability of the Qur’an’s Consiseness, 7
- Abdel Haleem M. A. S, 2004, The Qur’an
- ʿAbduh M., 1947, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ḥakīm al-mushtahir bi-ism Tafsīr al-Manār, 1
- Adams Charles C, 2010, Islam and Modernism. A Study of the Modern Reform Movement Inaugurated by Muḥammad ʿAbduh
- Albayrak I, 2004, Klāsik modernizmde Kur’ān’a yaklaşımlar
- Albayrak I, 2008, Journal of Islamic Studies, 47, 301
- Aydüz Davut, 2004, Tefsir Tarihi, Çeşitleri ve Konulu Tefsir
- Baljon J. M. S, 1961, Modern Muslim Koran Interpretation
- al-Bayhaqī Abū Bakr, 2003, Al-Jāmiʿ li-shuʿab al-īmān, 4
- al-Bayḍāwī, Anwār al-tanzīl wa-asrār al-taʾwīl, 1
- Beki Niyazi, 2008, Kur’ān’ın Yüksek ve Parlak Bir Tefsiri Risale-i Nur
- Beki Niyazi, 2010, Islamic University of Europe. Journal of Islamic Research, 5, 159
- Brown Daniel W, 1996, Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought
- Cündioğlu Dücane, 1999, İslamiyat, 2, 51
- Demirci Muhsin, 2003, Tefsir tarihi
- von Denffer Ahmad, 1994, Ulum al Qur’an
- Dhahabi M. H, Al-tafsīr wa-al-mufassirūn
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359561.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1080/09596410.2012.676781 · DOI
- Jansen J. J. G, 1974, The Interpretation of the Qur’an in Modern Egypt
- Koç M. A, 2012, Tefsir el Kitabı
- Mardin S, 1989, Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi
- Markham Ian S, 2009, Engaging with Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. A Model of Interfaith Dialogue
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2004, Signs of Miraculousness: The Inimitability of the Qur’an’s Consiseness
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2005, The Words: The Reconstruction of Islamic Belief and Thought
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2007, The Letters: Epistles on Islamic Thought, Belief, and Life
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2008, The Reasonings. A Key to Understanding the Qur’an’s Eloquence
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2009, İşārātü’l-İ’cāz
- Nursi Bediuzzaman Said, 2009, Tarihçe-i Hayat
- Paçacı Mehmet, 2003, Islāmiyāt, 6, 85
- Paçacı Mehmet, 2007, İslāmī İlimler Dergisi, 2, 7
- Qattān Mannāʿ al-, Mabāḥith fi ʿulūm al-Qurʾān
- al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn, 1981, Mafātīḥ al-ghayb, 2
- Saeed A, 2005, Interpreting the Qur’an, 10.4324/9780203016770 · DOI · Paper page
- Saeed A, 2005, Encyclopedia of Religion, 7561
- Saeed A, 2008, The Qur’an: An Introduction, 10.4324/9780203938454 · DOI
- al-Ṭabarī Muḥammad ibn Jarīr, 2001, Jāmiʿ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān, 1
- Troll Christian W, 1978, Sayyid Ahmad Khan. A Reinterpretation of Muslim Theology
- Turner Colin, 2010, The Rays: Reflections on Islamic Belief, Thought, Worship, and Action, xiii
- Vahide Şükran, 2003, Islam at the Crossroads: On the Life and Thought of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, 1
- Wielandt Rotraud, 2002, Encyclopaedia of the Qur’ān, 124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Çoruh, H. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13100982 · Cited by 11
“Interpreting the Qur’an in the light of isrā’ı̄liyyāt reports is considered under tradition-based exegesis (tafsı̄r bi-al-ma’thūr) (Çoruh 2017).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Çoruh, H.
- Affiliations
- Charles Sturt University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Çoruh, Hakan
- ORCID
- Çoruh, Hakan
- Venue
- Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-104
- ISSN
- 0959-6410 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9311
- OpenAlex
- W2587488458
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Keywords
- Said Nursi, Quranic exegesis, tafsir bi al-ra'y, usul al-tafsir, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, Islamic modernism, kalam, Islamic theology, al-Zamakhshari, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, al-Baydawi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review