The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research
Abstract
Rehabilitation using cognitive and behavioural treatment methods (i.e., experience-based interventions) faces particular challenges in improving its evidence base through rigorous studies such as randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Experience-based treatments are often complex, with multiple "active ingredients" that may be difficult to characterise. In addition to the difficulty in specifying treatment ingredients, experience-based rehabilitation researchers face challenges in designing or selecting appropriate control or comparison conditions to test the efficacy of complex treatments. Based on lessons learned in designing a cognitive-behavioural intervention for anger self-management for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) for the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded TBI Clinical Trials Network, we review the advantages, disadvantages and applications of a variety of control conditions for experience-based interventions. We discuss controls in which active treatments are withheld (no-treatment controls, waitlist controls, and placebo-analogue designs); controls that involve comparison to naturally occurring or devised usual care treatments; and conditions that compare active treatments (dismantling designs, dose controls, and equivalence trials). Recommendations for selecting and developing control groups that maximise both equipoise and participant enrolment/retention are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a growing discussion over the use of waitlist in psychological and behavioral research [83].”
Citations
Cites
Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., Felicetti, T., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., Harrington, D. E., et al. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.19240 · Cited by 1,290
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Alcohol interventions in a trauma center as a means of reducing the risk of injury recurrence
Gentilello, L. M., Rivara, F. P., Donovan, D. M., Jurkovich, G. J., Daranciang, E., Dunn, C. W., Villaveces, A., Copass, M., & Ries, R. R. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199910000-00003 · Cited by 770
Levine, B., Robertson, I. H., Clare, L., Carter, G., Hong, J., Wilson, B. A., DUNCAN, J., & Stuss, D. T. (2000) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617700633052 · Cited by 680
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., King, D. K., Morris, D. M., Crago, J. E., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000206463.66461.97 · Cited by 457
Wilson, B. A. (2001) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477 · Cited by 386
Butler, G., Fennell, M., Robson, P., & Gelder, M. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.167 · Cited by 365 · cited 1×
“This model has been widely used in psychotherapy outcome research (eg, Butler, Fennell, Robson, & Gelder, 1991 ).”
MethodBaskin, T. W., Tierney, S. C., Minami, T., & Wampold, B. E. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.6.973 · Cited by 351
Telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression
Mohr, D. C., Hart, S. L., Julian, L., Catledge, C., Honos-Webb, L., Vella, L., & Tasch, E. T. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.1007 · Cited by 298
It’s More Than a Black Box; It’s a Russian Doll: Defining Rehabilitation Treatments
Whyte, J., & Hart, T. (2003) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000078200.61840.2d · Cited by 297
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Borkovec T. D., 1996, Psythotherapy and Rehabilitation Research Bulletin, 5, 14
- Sohlberg M., 1989, Introduction to cognitive rehabiliation theory and practice
- 10.1097/00002060-200308000-00012 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Law, L. L. F., Barnett, F., Yau, M. K.-S., & Gray, M. A. (2014) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.008 · Cited by 374
Treatment for Depression after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
Fann, J. R., Hart, T., & Schomer, K. G. (2009) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1091 · Cited by 345
Self-citationExploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design
Cunningham, J. A., Kypri, K., & McCambridge, J. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-150 · Cited by 321
Kooij, D. T. A. M., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L. W., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000194 · Cited by 334
Neuropsychiatric Problems After Traumatic Brain Injury: Unraveling the Silent Epidemic
Vaishnavi, S., Rao, V., & Fann, J. R. (2009) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1176/appi.psy.50.3.198 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, T., Fann, J. R., & Novack, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hart, Tessa
- Venue
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0694
- OpenAlex
- W2019260073
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01HD042738, R24HD050836)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- control conditions, traumatic brain injury, randomized controlled trials, waitlist control, equivalence trials, equipoise, participant retention
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Behavior Therapy, Brain Injuries, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Therapeutic Human Experimentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
