Motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety following traumatic brain injury: A pilot randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Although cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the treatment of choice for anxiety, its delivery needs to be adapted for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). It also requires clients' active engagement for maximum benefit. This study was a pilot randomised controlled trial involving an anxiety treatment programme adapted for people with TBI, based on CBT and motivational interviewing (MI). Twenty-seven participants with moderate/severe TBI (aged 21-73 years, 78% males) recruited from a brain injury rehabilitation hospital were randomly allocated to receive MI + CBT (n = 9), non-directive counselling (NDC) + CBT (n = 10) and treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n = 8). CBT and MI were manualised and delivered in 12 weekly individual sessions. Primary outcome was self-reported anxiety symptoms assessed at baseline, at the end of NDC/MI and immediately following CBT. Assessment was conducted by assessors blinded to group assignment. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that the two active treatment groups demonstrated significantly greater anxiety reduction than TAU. Participants receiving MI showed greater response to CBT, in terms of reduction in anxiety, stress and non-productive coping, compared to participants who received NDC. The results provided preliminary support for the adapted CBT programme, and the potential utility of MI as treatment prelude. Longer follow-up data are required to evaluate the maintenance of treatment effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies using CBT to treat post-TBI anxiety have shown a delayed benefit up to six months post-intervention.
“Studies using CBT to treat post TBI anxiety (Hsieh et al., 2012) have shown a delayed benefit up to six months post-intervention.”
From Can acceptance and commitment therapy facilitate psychological adjustment after a severe traumatic brain injury? A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Hsieh et al., 2012
These effect sizes are comparable to those achieved using CBT with this population (e.g., ES=0.89 Medd & Tate, 2000; ES>1.0 Simpson et al., 2011; ES=0.50 Hsieh et al., 2012).
“These effect sizes (ES) are comparable to those achieved using CBT with this population, for example ES = 0.89 (Medd & Tate, 2000), ES > 1.0 (Simpson et al., 2011) and ES = 0.50 (Hsieh et al., 2012).”
From Can acceptance and commitment therapy facilitate psychological adjustment after a severe traumatic brain injury? A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Hsieh et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Hsieh, M.-Y., Ponsford, J., Wong, D., Schönberger, M., Taffe, J., & Mckay, A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- National Trauma Research Institute (AU)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Epworth Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ponsford, Jennie
- Venue
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 585-608
- ISSN
- 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0694
- OpenAlex
- W2030836867
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, anxiety, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, non-directive counseling, stress, non-productive coping, brain injury rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Brain Injuries, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Self Report, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review