The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Cognitive training approaches to remediate attention and executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A single-case series
Abstract
Attentional deficits are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and interfere with daily functioning. This study employed a single-case design to examine the effects of individualised strategy training on attention beyond the effects of computerised training using Attention Process Training 3 (APT-3), and to examine the participants' subjective experience of these approaches. An ABCA (baseline, APT-3, strategy training, follow-up) design was repeated across three participants with severe TBI. Outcomes were measured on alternate versions of the oral Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and cancellation tasks; generalisation with the Test of Everyday Attention (TEA) and self and significant other (SO) ratings on the Rating Scale of Attentional Behaviour (RSAB); and participant experiences with semi-structured interviews. Planned Tau-U analyses revealed improvements in speed of processing on the SDMT and the automatic condition of the cancellation task after APT-3 and at follow-up, but with most improvement after strategy training. Limited generalisation was evident on TEA subtests and self-RSAB ratings. SO-RSAB ratings were mixed after APT-3, but demonstrated improvement after strategy training. Variability in attentional deficits and everyday attentional requirements between patients required individualised goals and approaches to rehabilitation. This study highlights the need for individualised rehabilitation of attention to improve everyday functioning after TBI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants in the cited cognitive training studies were either already receiving other rehabilitation services or the intervention went further than only providing the cognitive training game.
“Participants in the cited cognitive training studies were either already receiving other rehabilitation services [17,18] or the intervention went further than only providing the cognitive training game [19].”
Evidence that these mechanisms can improve the brain's functioning has been found in individuals with traumatic brain injury, individuals with unspecified mild or moderate mental retardation, and children with FASD between the ages of 6 and 15 years.
“Evidence that these mechanisms can improve the brain’s functioning has been found in populations including individuals with traumatic brain injury [17], individuals with unspecified mild or moderate mental retardation [18], and children with FASD between the ages of 6 and 15 years [19].”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 25
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bayley M., 2007, ABIKUS Evidence based recommendations for rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injury
- Robertson I. H., 1996, Goal Management Training: A clinical manual
- Ruff R. M., 1995, Ruff 2 & 7 Selective Attention Test
- Sloan S., 2013, Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living, 99
- Sohlberg M. M., 2003, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11, xix
- Sohlberg M. M., 2010, APT-III Attention Process Training: A direct training program for persons with acquired brain injury
Metadata
- Authors
- Dymowski, A. R., Ponsford, J. L., & Willmott, C.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- The Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dymowski, Alicia Rhian
- Venue
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-10-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 866-894
- ISSN
- 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0694
- OpenAlex
- W2345129398
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Epworth Research Institute (80940)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, attention deficits, executive dysfunction, cognitive training, strategy training, individualised rehabilitation, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, cancellation task, processing speed
- MeSH terms
- Neurological Rehabilitation, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Cognitive Remediation, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review