Cited by 33Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Role of valued living and associations with functional outcome following traumatic brain injury

Pais (Hons.), Celia, Ponsford, Jennie L., Gould (Clin. Neuro), Kate R., Wong, Dana·2019·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Abstract

Valued living (VL) is associated with improved enjoyment and engagement with daily activities despite negative emotional state or ongoing pain. However, the role of VL in recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) has yet to be investigated. This study aimed to examine changes in VL over the course of recovery and variables associated with VL. Participants with moderate-to-severe TBI were recruited from a rehabilitation hospital in three cohorts: "Early" (n = 25), "Mid" (n = 9) and "Late" (n = 36) post-TBI. All participants were assessed at time of recruitment and 12 months later. The main measure was the Valued Living Questionnaire. Compared to pre-injury estimates, VL was significantly reduced at 12 months post-injury. Levels of VL remained reduced between 2 and 3 years and increased between 3 and 6 years post-injury. VL was strongly associated with improved functional and psychosocial outcomes. Changes in VL occur over at least 3-5 years post-injury, with 12 months post-TBI a suitable time for intervention given VL remains low over the next 24 to 36 months post injury. Targeted intervention to modify values and/or valued activities to be consistent with post-injury capacity could improve rates of return to pre-injury levels of VL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 33

Authors
Pais (Hons.), C., Ponsford, J. L., Gould (Clin. Neuro), K. R., & Wong, D.
Affiliations
  • Monash Institute for Cognitive & Clinical Neurosciences and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Wong, Dana
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
625-637
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
OpenAlex
W2605953768
Cited by
33
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research (D187 (N-M-12-034))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
valued living, traumatic brain injury, functional recovery, psychosocial outcomes, valued activities, moderate to severe TBI
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Human Activities, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Social Values, Time Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review