Role of valued living and associations with functional outcome following traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Valued living (VL) is associated with improved enjoyment and engagement with daily activities despite negative emotional state or ongoing pain. However, the role of VL in recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) has yet to be investigated. This study aimed to examine changes in VL over the course of recovery and variables associated with VL. Participants with moderate-to-severe TBI were recruited from a rehabilitation hospital in three cohorts: "Early" (n = 25), "Mid" (n = 9) and "Late" (n = 36) post-TBI. All participants were assessed at time of recruitment and 12 months later. The main measure was the Valued Living Questionnaire. Compared to pre-injury estimates, VL was significantly reduced at 12 months post-injury. Levels of VL remained reduced between 2 and 3 years and increased between 3 and 6 years post-injury. VL was strongly associated with improved functional and psychosocial outcomes. Changes in VL occur over at least 3-5 years post-injury, with 12 months post-TBI a suitable time for intervention given VL remains low over the next 24 to 36 months post injury. Targeted intervention to modify values and/or valued activities to be consistent with post-injury capacity could improve rates of return to pre-injury levels of VL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The VLQ has been used to measure valued living in a range of clinical populations including anxiety, chronic pain, depression and TBI.
“The VLQ has been used to measure valued living in a range of clinical populations including anxiety, chronic pain, depression and TBI.66 67”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study (2025) · cites this paper as [66]
Value-driven behaviour has already been found beneficial for people with acquired brain injury.
“value-driven behaviour has already been found beneficial for people with acquired brain injury.39,40”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for people with acquired brain injury: Rationale and description of the BrainACT treatment. (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
Higher levels of acceptance and valued living have been associated with better psychological outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury.
“Higher levels of acceptance and valued living have been associated with better psychological outcomes in patients with ABI [26–28].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Pais (Hons.), C., Ponsford, J. L., Gould (Clin. Neuro), K. R., & Wong, D.
- Affiliations
- Monash Institute for Cognitive & Clinical Neurosciences and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wong, Dana
- Venue
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-04-19
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 625-637
- ISSN
- 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0694
- OpenAlex
- W2605953768
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research (D187 (N-M-12-034))
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- valued living, traumatic brain injury, functional recovery, psychosocial outcomes, valued activities, moderate to severe TBI
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Human Activities, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Social Values, Time Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review