Cited by 399Food Safety and HygieneOccupational Health and Safety ResearchSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Food handlers' beliefs and self-reported practices

Clayton, Deborah A., Griffith, Christopher J., Price, Patricia, Peters, Adrian C.·2002·International Journal of Environmental Health Research

Abstract

Despite an increase in the number of food handlers receiving food hygiene training, a high proportion of food poisoning outbreaks still occur as a result of poor food handling practices. This paper uses elements of social cognitive theory to examine the beliefs of food handlers towards food safety and to determine food handlers' self-reported practices. Questionnaires were completed by 137 food handlers from 52 small to medium-sized food businesses in Wales. Generally, food handlers were aware of the food safety actions they should be carrying out but identified a number of barriers which would prevent them from implementing these practices. These barriers included lack of time, lack of staff and a lack of resources. Despite 95% of respondents receiving food hygiene training, 63% admitted to sometimes not carrying out food safety behaviours. All the food handlers also perceived their business to be of relatively low risk and yet all businesses prepared high risk foods. This research highlights the need for training to be based around a risk-based approach and demonstrates that behavioural change will not occur merely as a result of training. Food safety practices will only be implemented given adequate resources and an appropriate management culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09603120120110031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 399

Authors
Clayton, D. A., Griffith, C. J., Price, P., & Peters, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Wales (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Published
2002-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
  • 0960-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1619
OpenAlex
W2158392095
Cited by
399
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food handlers, food safety practices, food hygiene training, social cognitive theory, foodborne outbreak, barriers to behavior change, risk-based approach, self-reported practices, management culture
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Data Collection, Food Handling, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Hygiene, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Professional Competence, Risk Factors, Organizational Culture, Food Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review