Cited by 16Safety Systems Engineering in AutonomyReal-Time Systems SchedulingSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping to IEC 61508 the hardware safety integrity of elements developed to ISO 26262

Open access
Okoh, Peter, Myklebust, Thor·2024·Safety and Reliability

Abstract

Over the years, several functional safety standards for industries that handle safety electrical, electronic and electromechanical systems have been developed from iec 61508 (generic).these include isO 26262 (automotive), iec 61511 (process), eN 50129 (railway), iec 620621 (machinery), iec 61513 (nuclear), etc. the emergence of these standards gives to the associated industries domain-specific identities.however, in certain cases, the rate of updating the standards is greatly overtaken by the rapid evolution of new technologies with a high potential to obsolete existing designs.Besides, iec 61508-based critical components may experience shortage in the event of a global disaster as seen during the covid-19 pandemic, hence the need for a robust substitution means.to address these problems, the concept of cross-domain reuse of resources is being promoted between industries that have unequal pace of alignment to the state-of-the-art.however, the framework for domain-to-domain (D2D) exchange must be clearly defined to avoid confusion.the objective of this paper is to investigate whether and how safety levels defined in isO 26262 (automotive) can be mapped to safety levels in iec 61508.the paper builds on review of literature and standards and is delimited to hardware elements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09617353.2024.2343959

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Frigerio A. (2022). Functional-safety analysis of ASIL decomposition for redundant automotive systems [PhD thesis 1 (Research TU/e/Graduation TU/e) Electrical Engineering]. Eindhoven University of Technology.
  2. Marcus, F., & Mieslinger, J. (2012). Embedded processing marketing MCU industrial & automotive. In Functional Safety Seminar & 1-Day HerculesTM Workshop. Arrow Roadshow Silkeborg.
  3. SAE J3016. (2012). Recommended practice: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Okoh, P., & Myklebust, T.
Affiliations
  • Autronica Fire and Security (Norway) (NO)
  • SINTEF Digital (NO)
Corresponding author
Okoh, Peter
Venue
Safety and Reliability
Published
2024-04-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
114-130
ISSN
  • 0961-7353 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-4126
OpenAlex
W4396779289
Cited by
14
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Safety and Reliability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • The Norwegian Research Council
  • Integrated Service & Safety Platform (309406)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Keywords
IEC 61508, ISO 26262, functional safety, vehicle safety, component obsolescence, component shortages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review