The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues
Open accessAbstract
The impetus for this special debating forum arises from the concern about the impact of anthropogenic induced global climate change (GCC) and the assumption that GCC raises issues of significance with respect to the accountability of firms to stakeholders for financial and non-financial performance. Governments and supra-national bodies have sought to respond to GCC in a variety of ways, with the creation of markets in which carbon may be traded being just one manifestation. Carbon markets have the effect of putting a price on what was until very recently free and this change is likely to have financial consequences for firms in the longer term. In order to place the accounting implications of carbon markets in context, the paper provides a scientific and policy introduction to GCC. As regards accounting issues, the paper reviews the problems that are associated with the valuation of pollution allowances and their identification as assets (and the liabilities that arise if companies pollute beyond allowed levels). A closer inspection of the risks and uncertainties that arise from GCC initiates a discussion of non-financial accounting and reporting about carbon. Non-financial reporting is necessary to allow conditions for democratic accountability in an uncertain setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 2×
“See Rittel and Webber (1973) for the seminal work on such problems”
Background
Cited by
Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?
Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513571011080144 · Cited by 773
Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing
Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6 · Cited by 772
Accounting and the environment
Hopwood, A. G. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002 · Cited by 658
Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 · Cited by 622
Self-citationCarbon accounting: a systematic literature review
Stechemesser, K., & Guenther, E. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.021 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga-González, C.
- Venue
- European Accounting Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 697-717
- ISSN
- 0963-8180 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4497
- OpenAlex
- W2078268217
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638180802489162
- The paper
- Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga-González, C. (2008). Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues. European Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.