Media frames of mental illnesses: The potential impact of negative frames
Abstract
Background: Mass media (e.g., television news and entertainment programming, films and newspapers) are a primary source for information about mental illnesses. Aims: The possible effects of media coverage and predominant frames in which mental illnesses are portrayed are discussed. Methods: Framing is defined as the means by which media information is organized, presented and interpreted. The literature focused on media coverage of mental illnesses and media framing is reviewed. Results: The frequently negative frames used by the media to portray mental illnesses contribute to the development and persistence of the public's negative attitudes toward persons with mental illnesses. Conclusions: An obvious extension to this work is a systematic analysis of framing functions, structures and elements used in the media to describe mental illnesses. The experimental manipulation of mental illness frames and their consequences on media consumers will help to provide some understanding of how media consumers react specifically to frames of mental illnesses. Declaration of interest: None.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Views rooted in the stereotypical traditional model of psychological treatment are largely influenced by mass media as the predominant source of information for many people.
“Views rooted in the stereotypical traditional model of psychological treatment (i.e. face-to-face with a therapist) are largely influenced by mass media as the predominant source of information for many people [16, 17] which may impact upon the acceptance of alternative delivery methods of treatment.”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Individual and societal attitudes influence both practitioners' and patients' acceptance of remote health care.
“Despite the research evidence, individual and societal attitudes influence both practitioners’ and patients’ acceptance of remote health care.”
From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- SIEFF, E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- SIEFF, ELAINE
- Venue
- Journal of Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-269
- ISSN
- 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0567
- OpenAlex
- W2112045522
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- media framing, mental illness, negative framing, media coverage of mental illness, public attitudes toward mental illness, stigma, television news, entertainment programs, cinema, newspapers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review