The mechanisms underpinning peer support: a literature review
Abstract
Background : The employment of Peer Support Workers, who themselves have experience of significant emotional distress, can promote recovery at an individual and organisational level. While research examining the benefits of peer support within mental health services continues to grow, an understanding of how, and through what processes, these benefits are reached remains under-developed. Aims : To review the published research literature relating to the process of peer support and its underpinning mechanisms to better understand how and why it works. Method : A scoping review of published literature identified studies relating to peer support mechanisms, processes and relationships. Studies were summarised and findings analysed. Results : Five mechanisms were found to underpin peer support relationships (lived experience, love labour, the liminal position of the peer worker, strengths-focussed social and practical support, and the helper role). Conclusions : The identified mechanisms can underpin both the success and difficulties associated with peer support relationships. Further research should review a broader range of literature and clarify how these mechanisms contribute to peer support in different contexts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Little is currently known about how to mitigate stigmatizing attitudes, especially those relating to peer providers' liminal positions as both service users and providers.
“Yet, little is currently known about how to mitigate these stigmatizing attitudes, especially those relating to peer providers’ “liminal positions” as both service users and providers (see [95]).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 233
- Authors
- Watson, E.
- Affiliations
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Watson, Emma
- ORCID
- Watson, Emma
- Venue
- Journal of Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 677-688
- ISSN
- 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0567
- OpenAlex
- W2778913677
- Semantic Scholar
- 7292ee132222539501f72c05aa6125bdcc1fcb13
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- peer support, peer support workers, lived experience, helper role, recovery, mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Mental Health Recovery, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Peer Group, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review