Cited by 48Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Contested understandings of recovery in mental health

McCabe, Rhiannah, Whittington, Richard, Cramond, Laura, Perkins, Elizabeth·2018·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

Background The concept of recovery is contested throughout the existing literature and in mental health services. Little research exists that gives voice to service user perspectives of recovery. Aim This paper explores how service users in two recovery oriented services run by the National Health Service in North West England talked about recovery and what it meant to them. Method 14 service users accessing these services took part in semi-structured qualitative interviews focusing on the concept of recovery. Data were analysed using an interpretive phenomenological analysis approach. Results Service users talked about recovery as a dynamic, day to day process as well as an outcome; specifically related to being discharged from inpatient settings. A number of factors including relationships and medication were cited to have the potential to make or break recovery. Conclusions The study highlights the continued dominance of the biomedical model in mental health services. Service users appear to have internalised staff and services' understanding of recovery perhaps unsurprisingly given the power differential in these relationships. Implications for clinical practice are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638237.2018.1466037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovery was not a single state of being but a complex mix of the past, the here and now and, the future.

    “Recovery was not a single state of being but a complex mix of the past, the here and now and, the future (60).”
  • McCabe et al. pointed out in forensic mental health services "everyday activities such as walking and discussing books were talked about in the language of therapies administered by services. The 'reader group' and the 'walking group' were all discussed in terms of therapeutic interventions rather than fulfilling hobbies that people adopt in everyday life."

    “McCabe et al. (60) pointed out in forensic mental health services “everyday activities such as walking and discussing books were talked about in the language of therapies administered by services. The ‘reader group’ and the ‘walking group’ were all discussed in terms of therapeutic interventions rather than fulfilling hobbies that people adopt in everyday life.””

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 48

Authors
McCabe, R., Whittington, R., Cramond, L., & Perkins, E.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
McCabe, Rhiannah
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2018-05-17
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
475-481
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2804753461
Cited by
48
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Administration for Community Living
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
recovery, mental health service users, service user perspectives, recovery-oriented services, hospital discharge, biomedical model, medication, therapeutic relationship, power relations, mental health services
MeSH terms
Mental Health Recovery, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review