The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) is an audiovisual tool designed for the clinical assessment of social perception with alternate forms for re-testing. Part 1 assesses emotion recognition, Parts 2 and 3 assess the ability to interpret conversational remarks meant literally (i.e., sincere remarks and lies) or non-literally (i.e., sarcasm) as well as the ability to make judgments about the thoughts, intentions and feelings of speakers. This paper aims to examine TASIT's reliability and validity. METHOD: Some 32 adults with severe, chronic brain injuries were administered Form A twice, one week apart. 38 adults with brain injuries were readministered alternate forms over a period of 5 - 26 weeks. Construct validity was examined in subsets of a sample of 116 adults with brain injuries by relating TASIT performance to standard tests of neuropsychological function and specific social perception measures. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.74 - 0.88. Alternate forms reliability ranged from 0.62 - 0.83. TASIT performance was associated with face perception, information processing speed and working memory. Socially relevant new learning and executive tasks were significantly associated with TASIT performance whereas non-social tasks showed little association. Social perception tasks such as Ekman photos and theory of mind stories were also associated. CONCLUSIONS: TASIT has adequate psychometric properties as a clinical test of social perception. It is not overly prone to practice effects and is reliable for repeat administrations. Performance on TASIT is affected by information processing speed, working memory, new learning and executive functioning, but the uniquely social material that comprises the stimuli for TASIT will provide useful insights into the particular difficulties people with clinical conditions experience when interpreting complex social phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception
Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9 · Cited by 2,173
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
The neurobiology of social cognition
Adolphs, R. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00202-6 · Cited by 1,432
Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1023035012436 · Cited by 1,211
The frontal lobes are necessary for `theory of mind'
Stuss, D. T. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.2.279 · Cited by 660
Mcdonald (2003) · doi:10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001 · Cited by 657
Rowe, A. D., Bullock, P. R., Polkey, C. E., & Morris, R. G. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.600 · Cited by 400
Perception of emotion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease
Lavenu, I., Pasquier, F., Lebert, F., Petit, H., & der Linden, M. V. (1999) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-199904000-00007 · Cited by 206
Channon, S., & Crawford, S. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00154-2 · Cited by 160
Cited by
Galderisi, S., Rucci, P., Kirkpatrick, B., Mucci, A., Gibertoni, D., Rocca, P., Rossi, A., Bertolino, A., Strauss, G. P., Aguglia, E., et al. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4607 · Cited by 312
Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
Bora, E., & Berk, M. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.023 · Cited by 304
Danforth, A. L., Grob, C. S., Struble, C., Feduccia, A. A., Walker, N., Jerome, L., Yazar-Klosinski, B., & Emerson, A. (2018) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-018-5010-9 · Cited by 280
Khan, B. K., Yokoyama, J. S., Takada, L. T., Sha, S. J., Rutherford, N. J., Fong, J. C., Karydas, A. M., Wu, T., Ketelle, R. S., Baker, M. C., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-301883 · Cited by 185
Ranasinghe, K. G., Rankin, K. P., Pressman, P. S., Perry, D. C., Lobach, I. V., Seeley, W. W., Coppola, G., Karydas, A. M., Grinberg, L. T., Shany-Ur, T., et al. (2016) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2016 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, S., Bornhofen, C., Shum, D., Long, E., Saunders, C., & Neulinger, K.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1529-1542
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2049797561
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280600646185
- The paper
- McDonald, S., Bornhofen, C., Shum, D., Long, E., Saunders, C., & Neulinger, K. (2006). Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600646185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.