Cited by 37Employment and Welfare StudiesDisability Education and EmploymentWorkplace Health and Well-being

The role of empowerment and quality of life in depression severity among unemployed people with affective disorders receiving mental healthcare

Johanson, Suzanne, Bejerholm, Ulrika·2017·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sick leave and unemployment are highly prevalent among people with affective disorders. Their depression severity is disabling and inversely related to having employment. No evidence-based vocational rehabilitation exists for this target group. Knowledge is therefore needed to understand the psychosocial factors that affect depression severity in order to develop new rehabilitation interventions. This study examined relationships between depression severity and empowerment, working life aspirations, occupational engagement, and quality of life in unemployed people with affective disorders receiving mental healthcare. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study of 61 participants, instruments on psychosocial factors and questions on descriptive sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were administered. Descriptive, correlation, and regression statistics were applied. RESULTS: Correlation and regression analyses showed significant inverse relations between depression severity and empowerment and quality of life. The odds for more severe depression decreased with higher empowerment and quality of life. However, neither extent of engagement in daily life nor working life aspiration was related to depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: An empowerment approach and strategies, which support the quality of life, are needed in development of vocational rehabilitation interventions, and bridging of mental healthcare and vocational services. Implications for Rehabilitation Enhancing empowerment and quality life in the return to work process can decrease depression severity in unemployed people with affective disorder. There is a need to address work issues in addition to symptom reduction in primary and mental healthcare. Bridging the service and time gap between vocational rehabilitation and healthcare is recommended for mitigating long-term unemployment for people with affective disorders who want to work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2016.1211758

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 37

Authors
Johanson, S., & Bejerholm, U.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Johanson, Suzanne
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2016-08-16
Volume
39
Issue
18
Pages
1807-1813
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2511055556
Cited by
37
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Reg. No. 2010-1772)
  • REHSAM (Reg. No. 22010-014)
  • County Council of Region Skåne
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
depression severity, mood disorders, unemployment, empowerment, quality of life, occupational engagement, vocational rehabilitation, return to work, mental health services, psychosocial factors, service integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Unemployment, Logistic Models, Sick Leave, Mood Disorders, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review