Cited by 22Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Sex-based differences in pain distribution in a cohort of patients with persistent post-traumatic neck pain

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze a cohort of 745 consecutive patients referred to a regional specialist clinic for evaluation of post-traumatic neck pain during a five-year period. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study of baseline assessments performed by multi-professional rehabilitation teams according to a standardized checklist. RESULTS: The cohort contained nearly twice as many females as males (64% versus 36%). The type of injury did not differ between sexes. Of the entire cohort, 38% were diagnosed with widespread pain, 50% with regional pain, and 12% with local pain. The pain distribution among the females was 43% widespread, 48% regional, and 9% local, and corresponding figures among males were 29%, 53%, and 18%. Longer time between trauma and assessment did not affect pain distribution among the men, but a tendency towards more widespread pain was observed among the women. DISCUSSION: The importance of "female sex" as risk factor for the development of persistent pain after neck trauma needs to be discussed further. The high frequency of regional and widespread pain among patients with persistent neck pain after trauma calls for both multidisciplinary assessments and treatment strategies. The relationships between different pain distribution patterns, disability, activity, and psychological factors need to be studied further. Implications for rehabilitation Patients suffering from pain and disability after neck trauma constitute a significant proportion of patients with persistent pain. The importance of the risk factor "female sex" should be further discussed in the development of persistent pain after neck trauma. The high frequency of regional and widespread pain among patients with persistent neck pain after trauma calls both for multidisciplinary assessments and treatment strategies. The relationships between different pain distribution patterns, disability, activity, and psychological factors need to be studied further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2017.1280543

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Erichsen JE., 1867, On railway and other injuries of the nervous system
  2. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.05.010 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/15389588.2015.1014999 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/15389580309862 · DOI
  5. Stemper BD, 2003, Biomed Sci Instrum, 39, 245
  6. 10.1080/15389580802593269 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387f1d · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00007632-200005150-00007 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00097-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021194 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/1471-2474-9-80 · DOI
  12. Svensson M, 1998, Orthopade, 27, 820
  13. Freeman MD., 2015, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 3, 23
  14. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387fed · DOI
  15. Coppieters I, 2015, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18, E389
  16. Holm LW, 2009, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 32, S61
  17. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643eb8 · DOI
  18. Walton DM, 2013, The Open Orthop J, 7, 495
  19. 10.2519/jospt.2016.6918 · DOI
  20. Kasch H, 2016, Whiplash injury: perspectives on the development of chronic pain
  21. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090822.96814.13 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00586-004-0709-1 · DOI
  23. 10.3310/hta16490 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00193.x · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00002508-200503000-00009 · DOI
  26. Malfliet A, 2015, Pain Physician, 18, 223
  27. 10.1002/art.1780330203 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/art.38908 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/s12891-015-0631-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00285.x · DOI
  31. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000507 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003172 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.008 · DOI
  34. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b4666 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.007 · DOI
  36. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318160462a · DOI
  37. 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00018 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.004 · DOI
  39. 10.1097/01.brs.0000194841.83419.0b · DOI
  40. Ono K, 2006, Proc IRCOBI Conf, 103
  41. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00159-3 · DOI
  42. Stemper BD, 2007, Proc IRCOBI Conf, Maastricht (the Netherlands), 249
  43. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051911.45505.D3 · DOI
  44. Kitagawa Y, 2015, Proc IRCOBI Conf, 37
  45. Kullgren AS, 2013, Proc IRCOBI Conf, Gothenburg (Sweden)
  46. 10.1080/15389588.2014.885647 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb05794.x · DOI
  48. Bergman S, 2001, J Rheumatol, 28, 1369
  49. 10.1186/1471-2474-9-102 · DOI
  50. Schliessbach J, 2013, Eur J Pain, 17, 1502, 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00332.x · DOI
  51. 10.2165/00007256-200636100-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Bernhardtz L. Women and men in Sweden 2014: facts and figures. Statistics in Sweden 2014;421:1–104. Available at: http://www.scb.se/Statistik/_Publikationer/LE0201_2013B14_BR_X10BR1401ENG.pdf.
  53. 10.1177/1403494814562598 · DOI
  54. Macfarlane GJ, 2016, Ann Rheum Dis, 0, 1

Metadata

Authors
Westergren, H., Larsson, J., Freeman, M., Carlsson, A., Jöud, A., & Malmström, E.-M.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Chalmers Industriteknik (SE)
Corresponding author
Westergren, Hans
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2017-01-27
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
1085-1091
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2582190742
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Skane University Hospital
  • Personskadeförbundet
  • Personskade förbundet RTP
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
sex differences, chronic pain, pain distribution, widespread pain, regional pain, local pain, neck trauma, female sex as risk factor, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, disability
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time, Whiplash Injuries, Cohort Studies, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review