Cited by 14Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Long-lasting improvements in health-related quality of life among women with chronic pain, following multidisciplinary rehabilitation

Björnsdóttir, Sigrún Vala, Triebel, Jan, Arnljótsdóttir, Margrét, Tómasson, Gunnar, Valdimarsdóttir, Unnur Anna·2018·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether observed health-related quality-of-life improvements after four-week traditional multidisciplinary pain management program and additional neuroscience education and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic pain are sustained at six-month follow-up. METHOD: This observational longitudinal follow-up study, with complete follow-up of 75 women, 61.5% of initial traditional approach group (treated 2001-2005) and 56 (62.2%) receiving the new approach (treated 2006-2009). Pain intensity and quality of life were measured at baseline and six months after interventions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired samples t-tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Both groups showed sustained improvements in pain intensity (traditional approach = -10.6 [p < 0.001]; new approach = -14.5 [p < 0.001]) and quality of life (traditional approach = 6.4 [p < 0.001]; new approach = 6.9 [p < 0.001]). Sleep was not sustained among traditional approach group (change = 2.4 [p = 0.066]), whereas all other domains among both groups were sustained. Significant decline was observed from discharge to six month among both groups with the exception of the sleep domain among the traditional approach group, pain intensity among the new approach and financial status among both groups. No baseline differences were revealed between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary interventions for women with chronic pain conditions improved quality of life and pain intensity with lasting improvements observed half a year after treatment completion. Implications for rehabilitation Intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation is essential for chronic pain conditions. This follow-up study shows sustained improvement in health-related quality of life and pain intensity six months after such rehabilitation was completed. Emphasizing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and neuroscience patient education may contribute to less decline in pain intensity from discharge to six-month follow-up compared with a more traditional approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2017.1312565

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Björnsdóttir et al. (2017) concluded that a mindfulness-based interdisciplinary intervention with a pain specialist team was effective in managing long-term chronic musculoskeletal pain (six-month follow up).

    “Björnsdóttir et al. (2017) concluded that a mindfulness-based interdisciplinary intervention with a pain specialist team was effective in managing long-term chronic musculoskeletal pain (six-month follow up).”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a quasiexperimental study (2023) · cites this paper as Björnsdóttir et al. (2017)

  • The literature has shown a relationship between quality of life, pain, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms.

    “The literature has shown a relationship between quality of life, pain, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a quasiexperimental study (2023) · cites this paper as Björnsdóttir et al. (2017)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 14

Authors
Björnsdóttir, S. V., Triebel, J., Arnljótsdóttir, M., Tómasson, G., & Valdimarsdóttir, U. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • HNLFI Rehabilitation Clinic, Hveragerði, Iceland;
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Björnsdóttir, Sigrún Vala
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2017-04-14
Volume
40
Issue
15
Pages
1764-1772
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2606832949
Cited by
14
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Association of Icelandic Physical Therapists
  • Lifelong Learning Centre
  • Lifelong Learning Centre in Southern Iceland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, health-related quality of life, multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, pain intensity, women, sleep, biopsychosocial rehabilitation, long-term follow-up, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Physical Therapy Modalities, Young Adult, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review