Rehabilitation interventions after traumatic brain injury: a scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To (1) identify interventional research topics in traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, (2) describe potential knowledge gaps, and (3) uncover further needs for interventional TBI rehabilitation research for patients and families.Method We searched three databases (2006–2019) and screened 1552 non-duplicate articles. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, yielding 754 articles for full-text review. Of these, 425 were included, as relevant to the purpose of the scoping review.Findings Among articles on TBI rehabilitation, the majority (71.8%) applied quantitative methodology; of these only 19.7% were randomized controlled trials. Severe TBI was described more often than mild/moderate TBI populations. Hospital vs community/home rehabilitation was 55.1% vs 37.2%; rehabilitation at workplace/school was described in only 4.5% articles, while in 7.2% the setting was undisclosed. Of 83 articles describing work/education, only 14 were in a work/school context. An additional focus in the work/education articles was activities of daily living (n = 28), cognition (n = 33) and emotions (n = 23), few targeted family or network.Conclusion The main attention of interventional TBI rehabilitation studies has been on severe TBI and long-term rehabilitation. Gaps identified were rehabilitation of mild/moderate TBI populations, older populations, acute/sub-phase rehabilitation, return to work issues and studies including the family.Implications for rehabilitationA substantial number of interventional studies exist to guide long-term rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury with focus on daily life, physical, emotional and cognitive functioning.We recommend a stronger focus in the clinic on the following groups; people with mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, people in the acute and sub-acute phase, and older people with traumatic brain injury.Issues that target challenges returning to work should be addressed, while they are of importance to patients and families.Emphasis should be put on continuity of care and peer-support.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mTBI, therapy strives to return an individual to their baseline functioning; in more severe injuries, treatment often focuses on adjusting and living with the permanent consequences of an injury.
“for mTBI, therapy strives to return an individual to their baseline functioning.48 In more severe injuries, treatment often focuses on adjusting and living with the permanent consequences of an injury.49”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Sveen, U., Guldager, R., Soberg, H. L., Andreassen, T. A., Egerod, I., & Poulsen, I.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Sveen, Unni
- ORCID
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-06-13
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 653-660
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W3034244015
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Norwegian Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, brain injury rehabilitation, mild traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury, return to work, return to school, activities of daily living, cognitive rehabilitation, emotional recovery, older adults, family involvement, peer support, continuity of care, research gaps
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Attention, Brain Concussion, Cognition, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review