Cited by 50Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Rehabilitation interventions after traumatic brain injury: a scoping review

Open access
Sveen, Unni, Guldager, Rikke, Soberg, Helene Lundgaard, Andreassen, Tone Alm, Egerod, Ingrid, Poulsen, Ingrid·2022·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose To (1) identify interventional research topics in traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, (2) describe potential knowledge gaps, and (3) uncover further needs for interventional TBI rehabilitation research for patients and families.Method We searched three databases (2006–2019) and screened 1552 non-duplicate articles. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, yielding 754 articles for full-text review. Of these, 425 were included, as relevant to the purpose of the scoping review.Findings Among articles on TBI rehabilitation, the majority (71.8%) applied quantitative methodology; of these only 19.7% were randomized controlled trials. Severe TBI was described more often than mild/moderate TBI populations. Hospital vs community/home rehabilitation was 55.1% vs 37.2%; rehabilitation at workplace/school was described in only 4.5% articles, while in 7.2% the setting was undisclosed. Of 83 articles describing work/education, only 14 were in a work/school context. An additional focus in the work/education articles was activities of daily living (n = 28), cognition (n = 33) and emotions (n = 23), few targeted family or network.Conclusion The main attention of interventional TBI rehabilitation studies has been on severe TBI and long-term rehabilitation. Gaps identified were rehabilitation of mild/moderate TBI populations, older populations, acute/sub-phase rehabilitation, return to work issues and studies including the family.Implications for rehabilitationA substantial number of interventional studies exist to guide long-term rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury with focus on daily life, physical, emotional and cognitive functioning.We recommend a stronger focus in the clinic on the following groups; people with mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, people in the acute and sub-acute phase, and older people with traumatic brain injury.Issues that target challenges returning to work should be addressed, while they are of importance to patients and families.Emphasis should be put on continuity of care and peer-support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2020.1773940

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mTBI, therapy strives to return an individual to their baseline functioning; in more severe injuries, treatment often focuses on adjusting and living with the permanent consequences of an injury.

    “for mTBI, therapy strives to return an individual to their baseline functioning.48 In more severe injuries, treatment often focuses on adjusting and living with the permanent consequences of an injury.49”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 50

Authors
Sveen, U., Guldager, R., Soberg, H. L., Andreassen, T. A., Egerod, I., & Poulsen, I.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Sveen, Unni
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2020-06-13
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
653-660
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W3034244015
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Norwegian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, brain injury rehabilitation, mild traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury, return to work, return to school, activities of daily living, cognitive rehabilitation, emotional recovery, older adults, family involvement, peer support, continuity of care, research gaps
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Attention, Brain Concussion, Cognition, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review