The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mortality and morbidity among older adults with intellectual disability: health services considerations
Abstract
PURPOSE: Described is a study of the mortality and morbidity characteristics of 2752 adults with intellectual disability, age 40 and older, who died over a 10 year period in one American state. RESULTS: The main finding was that although individuals in the current generation of older adults with intellectual disability still generally die at an earlier age than do adults in the general population (average age at death: 66.1 years), many adults with intellectual disability live as long as their age peers in the general population. The results suggest that the longevity of adults with intellectual disability, whose aetiology is not attributable to organic causes, is progressively increasing. The results also confirm an increased longevity for adults with Down syndrome (average age at death: 55.8 years). Findings also showed that the causes of death for the study cohort were similar to those of the general older population, with cardiovascular, respiratory and neoplastic diseases among the most prominent causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: It was proposed that clinical and prophylactic health practices could have significant social and health care consequences for delaying the onset or minimizing the occurrence of life threatening diseases (and thus prolonging life) in adults with intellectual disability. It was suggested that clinical practices could be implemented that deter the onset and lessen the impact and burden of older age-related diseases and secondary conditions and that greater attention needs to be given to training of health care professionals in the area of geriatric medicine and intellectual disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FRIES, J. F. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00401.x · Cited by 449
Cited by
The Continuum of Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Common Mechanisms but Different Rates
Franceschi, C., Garagnani, P., Morsiani, C., Conte, M., Santoro, A., Grignolio, A., Monti, D., Capri, M., & Salvioli, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00061 · Cited by 945
A cascade of disparities: Health and health care access for people with intellectual disabilities
Krahn, G. L., Hammond, L., & Turner, A. (2006) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20098 · Cited by 775
Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome
Bittles, A., & Glasson, E. (2004) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1017/s0012162204000441 · Cited by 452
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Dern, S., Boisclair, W. C., Ashkenazy, E., & Baggs, A. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2262-7 · Cited by 419
Understanding Health Disparities and Inequities Faced by Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
Ouellette‐Kuntz, H. (2005) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00240.x · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- P. Janicki, Dalton, Michael Henderson, & Davidson, P. W.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 284-294
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2096713952
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality and morbidity among older adults with intellectual disability: health services considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/096382899297710
- The paper
- P. Janicki, Dalton, Michael Henderson, & Davidson, P. W. (1999). Mortality and morbidity among older adults with intellectual disability: health services considerations. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.