Cited by 149Environmental Education and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Information and the decision to recycle: Results from a survey of US households

Nixon, Hilary, Saphores, Jean-Daniel M.·2009·Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Abstract

This paper relies on a unique dataset collected during a national survey of US households to explore how different sources of information (print, television, radio, family/friends, work/school and others) influence the decision to start recycling. Although print media are influential, it is found that face-to-face communication (through family/friends or work/school) is the most effective medium to get people to start recycling. However, it is even better to provide households with recycling information from multiple sources. The respondents in this study identify concerns about storage space, time and the safety of recycling as the main obstacles to start recycling. In addition, age and ethnicity are statistically significant but not income or education. These findings should be useful for crafting information campaigns designed to boost recycling, although to be successful these campaigns need to incorporate findings from environmental psychology and knowledge of specific communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09640560802666610

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 149

Authors
Nixon, H., & Saphores, J.-D. M.
Affiliations
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Saphores, Jean-Daniel M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Published
2009-02-19
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
257-277
ISSN
  • 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0559
OpenAlex
W2025098725
Cited by
149
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of California, Irvine
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
recycling behavior, household recycling, information sources, face-to-face communication, print media, radio and television, barriers to recycling, environmental psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review