Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions
Open accessAbstract
Green infrastructure (GI) has been identified as a promising approach to help cities adapt to climate change through the provision of multiple ecosystem services. However, GI contributions to urban resilience will not be realized until it is more fully mainstreamed in the built environment and design professions. Here, we interrogate five key challenges for the effective implementation of GI: (1) design standards; (2) regulatory pathways; (3) socio-economic considerations; (4) financeability; and (5) innovation. Methods include a literature review, case studies, and interviews with resilience managers. We propose a people-centred and context-dependent approach to advance effective implementation of GI in urban planning. We highlight two underlying currents that run across all of the challenges – (1) the role of political will as a pre-condition for tackling all challenges holistically; and (2) the role of stakeholder engagement in achieving public support, harnessing funding, and maintaining and monitoring GI in the long term.Highlights:• The effective implementation of GI is context-specific and should adhere to the basic principles of appropriate technology.• Continuous community engagement is needed to ensure the inclusivity and multi-functionality of GI.• Challenges to successful GI are intersectional and therefore cannot be addressed singly in isolation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Governance challenges include limited uptake of NbS in urban planning, limited project-based planning, and siloed approaches in planning practices.
“Governance challenges include the limited uptake of NbS in urban planning, limited project-based planning, and siloed approaches in planning practices (23, 31, 53, 65, 66).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Ecological research on NbS often pays limited attention to social dynamics and issues of equity, justice, global power imbalances, and distribution of benefits across communities.
“Similarly, ecological research on NbS often pays limited attention to social dynamics and issues of equity, justice, global power imbalances, and distribution of benefits across communities (5, 49, 53).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Socioeconomic dimensions and context are underexamined in NbS research to date, and unappreciated in the role they play in the effective implementation of NbS.
“Socioeconomic dimensions and context are underexamined in NbS research to date, and unappreciated in the role they play in the effective implementation of NbS (53, 111).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 255
- Authors
- Zuniga-Teran, A. A., Staddon, C., de Vito, L., Gerlak, A. K., Ward, S., Schoeman, Y., Hart, A., & Booth, G.
- Affiliations
- Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA;
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK;
- University of Arizona (US)
- IIE MSA (ZA)
- Arcadis (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 710-732
- ISSN
- 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0559
- OpenAlex
- W2949227897
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Keywords
- green infrastructure, mainstreaming, urban resilience, climate change adaptation, ecosystem services, design standards, regulatory pathways, socio-economic considerations, innovation, political will, stakeholder engagement, community participation, appropriate technology, urban planning, built environment professions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review