The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements And Political Theories
Abstract
While calls for ‘environmental justice’ have grown recently, very little attention has been paid to exactly what the ‘justice’ of environmental justice refers to, particularly in the realm of social movement demands. Most understandings of environmental justice refer to the issue of equity, or the distribution of environmental ills and benefits. But defining environmental justice as equity is incomplete, as activists, communities, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) call for much more than just distribution. This essay examines how definitions beyond the distributive in these movements can help us develop conceptions of global environmental justice. The argument is that the justice demanded by global environmental justice is really threefold: equity in the distribution of environmental risk, recognition of the diversity of the participants and experiences in affected communities, and participation in the political processes which create and manage environmental policy. The existence of three different notions of justice in the movement, simultaneously, demonstrates the plausibility of a plural yet unified theory and practice of justice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Living between Water and Rocks: First Nations, Environmental Planning and Democracy
Borrows, J. (1997) · The University of Toronto Law Journal · doi:10.2307/825948 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Energy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationWalker, G., & Day, R. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.044 · Cited by 632
Social equity in urban resilience planning
Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., & Miller, T. R. (2019) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103 · Cited by 464
“Following this trend, and building specifically on the “widely accepted” conception of Schlosberg (2004, 2007) (Bulkeley, Edwards, and Fuller 2014, 33), we adopt a tripartite framework of social equity that includes distributional, recognitional, and procedural equity dimensions.”
BackgroundMethodRigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.026 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosberg, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-540
- ISSN
- 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8934
- OpenAlex
- W1979437250
- Cited by
- 1,451
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements And Political Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0964401042000229025
- The paper
- Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements And Political Theories. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.