Governing the termination problem in solar radiation management
Abstract
Technologies for Solar Radiation Management (SRM) could limit global warming by manipulating the Earth’s radiation balance. A major objection to SRM is the termination problem: the catastrophic consequences that are likely to result from its sudden discontinuation. The termination problem limits the reversibility of policy choices and poses the risk of inadvertent or enforced program collapse. It is often considered a major impediment to the governability of SRM. In a first attempt to systematically engage with the question of institutional design for resolving the termination problem, the scenarios in which the termination problem arises as well as their respective drivers are identified. Scenarios and drivers are then used to derive institutional solutions in the form of excludable benefits, scientific oversight and phase-out mechanisms. While other objections to SRM may remain valid, it is concluded that the termination problem raises fewer challenges for international governance than is usually assumed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Making SAI resilient to natural disasters or terrorist attacks seems relatively straightforward.
“Making SAI resilient to natural disasters or terrorist attacks seem relatively straight-forward (Parker and Irvine, 2018; Rabitz, 2019)”
From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Rabitz, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Rabitz, F.
- Affiliations
- Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
- Corresponding author
- Rabitz, Florian
- ORCID
- Rabitz, Florian
- Venue
- Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 502-522
- ISSN
- 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2891991284
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 22
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
- Keywords
- solar radiation management, termination problem, geoengineering governance, international governance, institutional design, climate change mitigation, global warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review