The tonic/phasic model of dopamine system regulation and its implications for understanding alcohol and psychostimulant craving
Abstract
All drugs of abuse have been shown to act either directly or indirectly by increasing dopamine neurotransmission within the limbic system. Thus, alcohol has been shown to increase dopamine transmission primarily by activating dopamine cell spike activity, whereas psychostimulants increase dopamine transmission by inhibiting the removal of dopamine from the synaptic space after its release. The spike‐dependent release of dopamine that is modulated by drugs of abuse to lead to their rewarding actions has been termed the phasic dopamine response. In contrast, with repeated drug administration, dopamine will also accumulate in the extracellular space of the nucleus accumbens in concentrations too low to stimulate postsynaptic receptors, but of sufficient magnitude to activate dopamine release‐inhibiting autoreceptors. In addition, the level of extracellular dopamine is proposed to be under the regulatory influence of cortico‐accumbens afferents. This steady‐state level of extrasynaptic dopamine has been termed the tonic dopamine response. In this paper it is proposed that several of the aspects of drug addiction, withdrawal and craving associated with the continued use of these drugs can be explained on the basis of their effects on tonic versus phasic dopamine system function. Thus, the increase in tonic dopamine levels that occurs with repeated drug administration would serve to oppose phasic dopamine release via stimulation of dopamine terminal autoreceptors, causing the subject to increase drug administration to restore the phasic response. Moreover, after withdrawal from the drugs, exposure to priming doses of drug or to drug‐related stimuli are proposed to increase tonic dopamine levels, again triggering drug‐seeking behavior in order to restore balance between the tonic and phasic dopamine systems. Therefore, one consequence of continued drug use is that these parameters of dopamine system function that normally serve to keep the system stable will enter into a new steady‐state homeostasis, from which the system is particularly susceptible to destabilizing influences that may precipitate relapse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Executive function impairments mediated by the prefrontal cortex may be linked to tonic dopamine firing changes that produce lower but more stable dopamine levels in prefrontal projections.
“By contrast, parallel impairments in executive function that are mediated by the prefrontal cortex might be linked to changes in tonic dopamine cell firing that result in lower but more stable dopamine levels in the dopamine projections to the prefrontal cortex.”
From Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [62]
Downstream changes in executive function that occur in addiction are linked with changes in tonic DA cell firing, which result in lower and more stable DA levels.
“in contrast to the downstream changes in executive function that occur in addiction that are linked with changes in tonic DA cell firing, which result in lower and more stable DA levels (Grace 2000;Wanat et al 2009).”
From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Grace 2000
The rewarding and conditioning effects of drugs are predominantly driven by phasic DA cell firing, which results in large and transient DA increases.
“Overall, it appears that the rewarding and conditioning effects of drugs are predominantly driven by phasic DA cell firing, which result in large and transient DA increases, in contrast to the downstream changes in executive function that occur in addiction that are linked with changes in tonic DA cell firing, which result in lower and more stable DA levels (Grace 2000;Wanat et al 2009).”
From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Grace 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 433
- Authors
- Grace, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grace, Anthony A.
- ORCID
- Grace, Anthony A.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8s2
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2000146111
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k02mh001055-08)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-29670, MH-57440, MH 01055)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine autoreceptors, nucleus accumbens, alcohol craving, drug addiction, withdrawal, relapse, drug-seeking behavior, dopamine homeostasis
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Animals, Central Nervous System Depressants, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Limbic System, Obsessive Behavior, Psychotropic Drugs, Recurrence, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Substance-Related Disorders, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review