Using the Internet to access information inflates future use of the Internet to access other information
Abstract
The ways in which people learn, remember, and solve problems have all been impacted by the Internet. The present research explored how people become primed to use the Internet as a form of cognitive offloading. In three experiments, we show that using the Internet to retrieve information alters a person's propensity to use the Internet to retrieve other information. Specifically, participants who used Google to answer an initial set of difficult trivia questions were more likely to decide to use Google when answering a new set of relatively easy trivia questions than were participants who answered the initial questions from memory. These results suggest that relying on the Internet to access information makes one more likely to rely on the Internet to access other information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There appear to be carry-over effects in offloading behaviour between successive tasks: participants relying more on offloading in one task also rely more on offloading in a subsequent task.
“Furthermore, there appear to be carry-over effects in offloading behaviour between successive tasks (i.e., participants relying more on offloading in one task also rely more on offloading in a subsequent task; Storm et al., 2016).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Storm et al., 2016
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Storm, B. C., Stone, S. M., & Benjamin, A. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Storm, Benjamin C.
- Venue
- Memory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-18
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 717-723
- ISSN
- 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0686
- OpenAlex
- W2478282530
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- cognitive offloading, internet use, information retrieval, Google, problem solving, trivia questions
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Research, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review