Cited by 37Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks

Runge, Yannick, Frings, Christian, Tempel, Tobias·2019·Memory

Abstract

By saving and storing information, we use digital devices as our external memory stores, being able to offload and temporarily forget saved contents. Storm and Stone [2015. Saving-enhanced memory: The benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188] showed that such memory offloading can be beneficial for subsequent memory performance. Saving already encoded items enhanced recall of items encoded after saving. In the present study, we did not only replicate saving-enhanced memory but found saving-enhanced performance for unrelated cognitively demanding tasks. Participants solved more modular arithmetic problems when they were able to offload a previously studied word list, compared to trials without the possibility to offload. Thus, saving of recently encoded items entailed a general benefit on subsequent cognitive performance, beyond encoding and retrieving word lists. We assume that offloading frees participants from the need to maintain offloaded items. Gained resources can then be used for subsequent tasks with high cognitive demands. In a nutshell, memory offloading can help to reduce the amount of information that has to be processed at a given time, efficiently delegating our limited cognitive resources to the most relevant tasks at hand while currently irrelevant information are safely stored outside our own memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2019.1654520

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Offloading irrelevant information into technical tools improves cognitive performance for subsequent, unrelated tasks as well as memory for unrelated information.

    “On one hand, offloading irrelevant information into technical tools improves cognitive performance for subsequent, unrelated tasks (Runge et al., 2019) as well as memory for unrelated information (Storm & Stone, 2015).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Runge et al., 2019

  • Cognitive offloading could also affect cognitive performance for unrelated materials or in unrelated tasks.

    “Beyond the offloaded information itself, however, cognitive offloading could also affect cognitive performance for unrelated materials or in unrelated tasks (Runge et al., 2019; Storm & Stone, 2015).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Runge et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runge, Y., Frings, C., & Tempel, T.
Affiliations
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Ludwigsburg University of Education (DE)
Corresponding author
Runge, Yannick
Venue
Memory
Published
2019-08-16
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
1462-1467
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2968371825
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
memory offloading, external memory, digital devices, cognitive load, modular arithmetic, working memory, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Cues, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mathematics, Mental Recall, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review