Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks
Abstract
By saving and storing information, we use digital devices as our external memory stores, being able to offload and temporarily forget saved contents. Storm and Stone [2015. Saving-enhanced memory: The benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188] showed that such memory offloading can be beneficial for subsequent memory performance. Saving already encoded items enhanced recall of items encoded after saving. In the present study, we did not only replicate saving-enhanced memory but found saving-enhanced performance for unrelated cognitively demanding tasks. Participants solved more modular arithmetic problems when they were able to offload a previously studied word list, compared to trials without the possibility to offload. Thus, saving of recently encoded items entailed a general benefit on subsequent cognitive performance, beyond encoding and retrieving word lists. We assume that offloading frees participants from the need to maintain offloaded items. Gained resources can then be used for subsequent tasks with high cognitive demands. In a nutshell, memory offloading can help to reduce the amount of information that has to be processed at a given time, efficiently delegating our limited cognitive resources to the most relevant tasks at hand while currently irrelevant information are safely stored outside our own memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Offloading irrelevant information into technical tools improves cognitive performance for subsequent, unrelated tasks as well as memory for unrelated information.
“On one hand, offloading irrelevant information into technical tools improves cognitive performance for subsequent, unrelated tasks (Runge et al., 2019) as well as memory for unrelated information (Storm & Stone, 2015).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Runge et al., 2019
Cognitive offloading could also affect cognitive performance for unrelated materials or in unrelated tasks.
“Beyond the offloaded information itself, however, cognitive offloading could also affect cognitive performance for unrelated materials or in unrelated tasks (Runge et al., 2019; Storm & Stone, 2015).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Runge et al., 2019
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207745 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 · Cited by 1,502 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Expecting such costs of memory offloading for offloaded information is also in line with literature on cognitive offloading (for a review see Risko & Gilbert, 2016).”
ResultSaving-Enhanced Memory: The Benefits of Saving on the Learning and Remembering of New Information
Storm, B. C., & Stone, S. M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614559285 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom
Bellinger, D. B., DeCaro, M. S., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.001 · Cited by 137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In previous studies, modular arithmetic has been considered an index of working-memory capacity (e.g., Beilock & Carr, 2005; Bellinger et al., 2015; MattarellaMicke et al., 2011).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory
Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211008060 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Beyond the offloaded information itself, however, cognitive offloading could also affect cognitive performance for unrelated materials or in unrelated tasks (Runge et al., 2019; Storm & Stone, 2015).”
BackgroundOutsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’
Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization
Skulmowski, A. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Runge et al. (2019) conducted a study in which the effects of offloading items from a to-be-learned word list on solving arithmetic problems were investigated.”
BackgroundMedia, technology, and the sins of memory
Schacter, D. L. (2022) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2021.3 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Harder Than You Think: How Outside Assistance Leads to Overconfidence
Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620975779 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Runge, Y., Frings, C., & Tempel, T.
- Affiliations
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Ludwigsburg University of Education (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Runge, Yannick
- Venue
- Memory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1462-1467
- ISSN
- 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0686
- OpenAlex
- W2968371825
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- memory offloading, external memory, digital devices, cognitive load, modular arithmetic, working memory, cognitive performance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Cues, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mathematics, Mental Recall, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review