The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Upon entering NATO: explaining defence willingness among Swedes
Open accessAbstract
In the wake of the new security situation in Europe, Sweden has decided to apply for membership in NATO. After over 200 years without war, the country must now be set to defend not just itself, but its allies as well. Are Swedes ready for this? Previous research has shown a high willingness among Swedes to defend their country. But what actually explains this high defence willingness among Swedes, given their unfamiliarity with the task? To examine the willingness of the country’s population to contribute to the military, we make use of survey data collected before and after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It turns out that the most general explanation for defence willingness, namely threat perception, has little or no explanatory value in the Swedish context. Surprisingly, this was true before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, as well as after. Furthermore, context-specific explanations citing the prevalence of emancipatory values among Swedes find no support either. However, this study does find robust support for gender, trust and political orientation as important explanatory factors for defence willingness. Our findings thus underscore some challenges facing Sweden as a newcomer to NATO, as political divides along lines of gender and trust widen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1080/00396338.2022.2078046 · DOI
- 10.1080/00396338.2022.2150430 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123417000679 · DOI
- 10.1080/09662839.2022.2113062 · DOI
- Bjereld, U., and Oscarsson, H., 2023. Jordskred i svensk Nato-opinion efter Rysslands invasion av Ukraina. In: U. Andersson, P. Öhberg, A. Carlander, J. Martinsson, and N. Theorin, eds. Ovisshetens tid. Gothenburg: SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, 141–154.
- 10.1080/09662839.2023.2221185 · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2008.55.4.443 · DOI
- Egnell, R., 2016. Feministisk utrikespolitik i teori och praktik. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 118 (4), 563–587. https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/16441.
- 10.1162/016228803322427992 · DOI
- 10.1093/isq/sqv019 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1743923X17000228 · DOI
- FOI. 2021. Vad är försvarsvilja? Och hur viktig är den? Available from: https://www.foi.se/nyheter-och-press/nyheter/2021-12-09-vad-ar-forsvarsvilja-och-hur-viktig-ar-den.html [Accessed 17 August 2023].
- 10.1108/GM-05-2022-0180 · DOI
- Holmberg, S., 2022. Politiserade bedömningar av offentlig verksamhet. In: U. Andersson, H. Oscarsson, B. Rönnerstrand, and N. Theorin, eds. Du sköra nya värld. Gothenburg: SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, 163–178.
- 10.1017/S0022381611000119 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343314565756 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511790881 · DOI
- Jeraj S. 2022. Are green parties still pacifist? Green European Journal. Available from: https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/are-green-parties-still-pacifists/ [Accessed 17 August 2023].
- 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00459.x · DOI
- 10.1093/cesifo/ifac008 · DOI
- 10.1177/001083601400422379 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511609336 · DOI
- 10.1177/002234338602300106 · DOI
- 10.1177/1478929917699416 · DOI
- 10.1111/gean.12250 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343302039005003 · DOI
- Puranen, B., 2014. Allegiance eroding: people’s dwindling willingness to fight in wars. In: R. J. Dalton and C. Welzel, eds. The civic culture transformed: from allegiant to assertive citizens. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 261–281 · DOI
- Putnam, R.D., 1992. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 10.1145/358916.361990 · DOI
- 10.5964/jspp.7539 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/0195150899.003.0004 · DOI
- 10.1080/10242690302929 · DOI
- 10.1177/0891243220946029 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139540919 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14702436.2019.1568192 · DOI
- Ydén, K., Bjereld, U., and Berndtsson, J., 2023. Svensk säkerhet i krigets skugga: Nato, försvaret och stödet till Ukraina. In: U. Andersson, P. Öhberg, A. Carlander, J. Martinsson, and N. Theorin, eds. Ovisshetens tid. Gothenburg: SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, 129–140.
- 10.1093/poq/nfn054 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“What is psychological in psychological defence? Revisiting the Nordic total defence doctrines”
Pursiainen, C. (2026) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2026.2664463
Metadata
- Authors
- Persson, T., & Widmalm, S.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Persson, Thomas
- Venue
- European Security
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-12-26
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 690-710
- ISSN
- 0966-2839 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-1545
- OpenAlex
- W4390228717
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Security (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap (2020-16264)
- Swedish Psychological Defence Agency (FÖR 19/2022)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › German Security and Defense Policies
- Keywords
- NATO membership, Sweden, threat perception, emancipatory values, gender differences, public trust in government, political orientation, military service, Russian invasion of Ukraine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
