Cited by 71Urban Green Space and HealthRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

From nature experience to visitors’ pro-environmental behavior: the role of perceived restorativeness and well-being

Zhang, Hongmei, Zhang, Xin, Yang, Yijiang, Ma, Jianyu·2024·Journal of Sustainable Tourism

Abstract

This research presents two studies covering two interconnected and sequential research questions in the context of a developing country (China): (1) What psychological responses do different types of environmental experiences elicit in visitors and (2) how are the psychological responses and following behavioral responses elicited by natural experiences? The research posits that the feelings of well-being and pro-environmental behavior (PEB) are elicited through the mechanism of perceived restorativeness. Study 1 (a scenario experiment) suggests that national parks produce higher subjective vitality but similar perceived restorative outcomes compared to city parks. Study 2 (a survey) presents a theoretical model examining the relationships among perceived restorativeness, general subjective well-being (SWB), trip-specific SWB, and PEB in a peri-urban national forest park context. The results indicate that perceived restorativeness is an important factor influencing visitors’ well-being and PEB, though the association between SWB and PEB was nonsignificant. Our studies provide cross-cultural confirmation of the restorative effects of the natural environment. They also provide evidence that nature-based tourism could be a valid nature-based solution for improving the health and well-being of both humans and the earth, through the role of perceived restorativeness of nature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09669582.2023.2184314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of developing countries, Zhang et al. (2024) found that in suburban national forest parks, there was a positive correlation between perceived restorativeness and general subjective wellbeing (i.e., hedonic experience).

    “In the context of developing countries, Zhang et al. (2024) found that in suburban national forest parks, there was a positive correlation between perceived restorativeness and general subjective wellbeing (i.e., hedonic experience).”
  • Existing studies mainly focus on hedonistic wellbeing, with relatively few studies on self-achievement and personal development.

    “Existing studies mainly focus on hedonistic wellbeing, with relatively few studies on self-achievement and personal development (Wang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2024).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 71

Authors
Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., & Ma, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Normal University (CN)
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yijiang
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Published
2023-03
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
861-882
ISSN
  • 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7646
OpenAlex
W4322730789
Cited by
71
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
perceived restorativeness, pro-environmental behavior, nature-based tourism, subjective well-being, nature experience, national parks, urban parks, nature-based solutions, visitor behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review