From nature experience to visitors’ pro-environmental behavior: the role of perceived restorativeness and well-being
Abstract
This research presents two studies covering two interconnected and sequential research questions in the context of a developing country (China): (1) What psychological responses do different types of environmental experiences elicit in visitors and (2) how are the psychological responses and following behavioral responses elicited by natural experiences? The research posits that the feelings of well-being and pro-environmental behavior (PEB) are elicited through the mechanism of perceived restorativeness. Study 1 (a scenario experiment) suggests that national parks produce higher subjective vitality but similar perceived restorative outcomes compared to city parks. Study 2 (a survey) presents a theoretical model examining the relationships among perceived restorativeness, general subjective well-being (SWB), trip-specific SWB, and PEB in a peri-urban national forest park context. The results indicate that perceived restorativeness is an important factor influencing visitors’ well-being and PEB, though the association between SWB and PEB was nonsignificant. Our studies provide cross-cultural confirmation of the restorative effects of the natural environment. They also provide evidence that nature-based tourism could be a valid nature-based solution for improving the health and well-being of both humans and the earth, through the role of perceived restorativeness of nature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the context of developing countries, Zhang et al. (2024) found that in suburban national forest parks, there was a positive correlation between perceived restorativeness and general subjective wellbeing (i.e., hedonic experience).
“In the context of developing countries, Zhang et al. (2024) found that in suburban national forest parks, there was a positive correlation between perceived restorativeness and general subjective wellbeing (i.e., hedonic experience).”
From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2024
Existing studies mainly focus on hedonistic wellbeing, with relatively few studies on self-achievement and personal development.
“Existing studies mainly focus on hedonistic wellbeing, with relatively few studies on self-achievement and personal development (Wang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2024).”
From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., & Ma, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Normal University (CN)
- Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Yijiang
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 861-882
- ISSN
- 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7646
- OpenAlex
- W4322730789
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- perceived restorativeness, pro-environmental behavior, nature-based tourism, subjective well-being, nature experience, national parks, urban parks, nature-based solutions, visitor behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review