Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution of intracellular nitrogen in marine microalgae: Calculation of new nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors

Open access
Lourenço, Sergio O, Barbarino, Elisabete, Lavín, Paris L, Lanfer Marquez, Ursula M, Aidar, Elizabeth·2004·European Journal of Phycology

Abstract

Nitrogen budgets in microalgae are strongly affected by growth conditions and physiological state of the cultures. As a consequence, protein N (PN) to total N (TN) ratio may be variable in microalgae grown in batch cultures, and this may limit the usefulness of the nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors (N-Prot factors), the most practical way of determining protein content. The accuracy of protein determination by this method depends on the establishment of specific N-Prot factors, and experimental data are needed to fill this gap. Complementing a previous study, the present work was designed to quantify the fluctuations of the main nitrogenous compounds during the growth of 12 species of marine microalgae, as well as to determine N-Prot factors for them. The microalgae were cultured in two experimental conditions: (a) using a N-replete culture medium (initial N concentration, 1.18 mM) and aeration, and (b) with a N-depleted culture medium (initial N concentration, 235 μM) and no aeration. The distribution of intracellular nitrogen was studied by constructing budgets of different nitrogen pools in different growth phases of the cultures. In all species, large variations occurred in the distribution of PN and non-protein N (NPN) in the treatments tested and in different growth phases. Intracellular inorganic nitrogen (NO3 − , NO2 − and NH3 + NH4 + ) was the most important NPN component (0.4 – 30.4% of TN) in all species, followed by nucleic acids (0.3 – 12.2% of TN), and chlorophylls (0.1 – 1.8% of TN). The relative importance of NPN was greater in the exponential phase, decreasing during growth. PN ranged from 59.3 to 96.8% of TN. N-Prot factors are proposed for each of the species studied, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to TN, with values ranging from 2.53 to 5.77. Based on current results and on the previous study, we establish an overall average N-Prot factor for all species, treatments and growth phases of 4.78 ± 0.62 (n = 354). This study confirms that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is unsuitable for marine microalgae, and the use of the N-Prot factors proposed here is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0967026032000157156

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Lourenço, S. O., Barbarino, E., Lavín, P. L., Lanfer Marquez, U. M., & Aidar, E.
Venue
European Journal of Phycology
Published
2004-02
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
17-32
ISSN
  • 0967-0262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4433
OpenAlex
W1985776865
Cited by
507
References
3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of intracellular nitrogen in marine microalgae: Calculation of new nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0967026032000157156
The paper
Lourenço, S. O., Barbarino, E., Lavín, P. L., Lanfer Marquez, U. M., & Aidar, E. (2004). Distribution of intracellular nitrogen in marine microalgae: Calculation of new nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors. European Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967026032000157156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.