Independent living and community care: a disempowering framework
Abstract
The British disability movement has had significant achievements in its struggle for independent living. However, the current community care framework contains many barriers to independent living. This article sets out a conceptual framework for an understanding of independent living and provides an analysis of the barriers posed by the social care system. These range from financial incentives for placing disabled people in residential care, to a failure to address needs relating to employment, parenting and leisure. Disabling attitudes held by social services professionals about ‘risk’ and ‘capacity’ are also major barriers. It is clear that, unless the legislative framework is amended to include an entitlement to independent living, disabled people will continue to be denied their full human and civil rights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Independence does not mean that a person functions without help; it is best achieved when properly directed social supports are in place.
“It is noteworthy that independence does not mean that a person functions without help but, on the contrary, it is best achieved when properly directed social supports are in place (Morris 2004);”
From Quadriplegia, virtue theory, and flourishing: a qualitative study drawing on self-narratives (2018) · cites this paper as Morris 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quadriplegia, virtue theory, and flourishing: a qualitative study drawing on self-narratives
Clifton, S., Llewellyn, G., & Shakespeare, T. (2018) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1379951 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morris, J.
- Corresponding author
- Morris, Jenny
- ORCID
- Morris, Jenny
- Venue
- Disability & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-442
- ISSN
- 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
- 0968-7599
- 1360-0508
- OpenAlex
- W2003717768
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- independent living, community-based care, disability, residential care, social care system, employment of people with disabilities, leisure, social service workers, disability rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review