The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies
Open accessAbstract
This article posits a number of provocations for scholars and researchers engaged with Critical Disability Studies. We summarise some of the analytical twists and turns occurring over the last few years that create a number of questions and concerns. We begin by introducing Critical Disability Studies; describing it as an interdisciplinary field of scholarship building on foundational disability studies theories. Critical Disability Studies scholarship is being produced at an exponential rate and we assert that we need to take pause for thought. We lay out five provocations to encourage reflection and debate: what is the purpose of Critical Disability Studies; how inclusive is Critical Disability Studies; is disability the object or subject of studies; what matters or gets said about disability; and how can we attend to disability and ability? We conclude by making a case for a reflexive and politicised Critical Disability Studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,810
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
Ahmed, S. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748691142 · Cited by 8,060
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Hall, T. D., & Smith, L. T. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2653993 · Cited by 7,420
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, S. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203700372 · Cited by 4,720
Oliver, M. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · Cited by 4,227
Guattari, F., & Deleuze, G. (1980) · Cited by 2,657
Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature
Folwell, A., & Thomson, R. G. (1998) · American Literature · doi:10.2307/2902469 · Cited by 2,108
On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’
Milton, D. E. M. (2012) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.710008 · Cited by 2,082
Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body
Davis, L. J. (1995) · Cited by 1,888
Cited by
Intersectionality within critical autism studies: a narrative review
Mallipeddi, N. V., & VanDaalen, R. A. (2022) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2021.0014 · Cited by 117
Oswal, N., Al-Kilani, M. H., Faisal, R., & Fteiha, M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15050518 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K.
- Venue
- Disability & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-03-22
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 972-997
- ISSN
- 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
- 0968-7599
- 1360-0508
- OpenAlex
- W2924900197
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 67.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Provocations for Critical Disability Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
- The paper
- Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for Critical Disability Studies. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.