The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional engineered channels and pores (Review)
Open accessAbstract
Significant progress has been made in membrane protein engineering over the last 5 years, based largely on the re-design of existing scaffolds. Engineering techniques that have been employed include direct genetic engineering, both covalent and non-covalent modification, unnatural amino acid mutagenesis and total synthesis aided by chemical ligation of unprotected fragments. Combinatorial mutagenesis and directed evolution remain, by contrast, underemployed. Techniques for assembling and purifying heteromeric multisubunit pores have been improved. Progress in the de novo design of channels and pores has been slower. But, we are at the beginning of a new era in membrane protein engineering based on the accelerating acquisition of structural information, a better understanding of molecular motion in membrane proteins, technical improvements in membrane protein refolding and the application of computational approaches developed for soluble proteins. In addition, the next 5 years should see further advances in the applications of engineered channels and pores, notably in therapeutics and sensor technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipid–protein interactions in biological membranes: A structural perspective
Lee, A. G. (2003) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00056-7 · Cited by 886 · cited 1×
“There are several other situations where more attention should be given to the participation of lipids (Lee 2003, Hong and Tamm 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and Architectures
Grieshaber, D., MacKenzie, R., Vörös, J., & Reimhult, E. (2008) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s80314000 · Cited by 2,329
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Allosteric control of an ionotropic glutamate receptor with an optical switch
Volgraf, M., Gorostiza, P., Numano, R., Kramer, R. H., Isacoff, E. Y., & Trauner, D. (2006) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio756 · Cited by 573
Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore
Stoddart, D., Heron, A. J., Mikhailova, E., Maglia, G., & Bayley, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901054106 · Cited by 482
Self-citationFunctional Bionetworks from Nanoliter Water Droplets
Holden, M. A., Needham, D., & Bayley, H. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja072292a · Cited by 349
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayley, H., & Jayasinghe, L.
- Venue
- Molecular Membrane Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 209-220
- ISSN
- 0968-7688 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5203
- OpenAlex
- W2165642493
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional engineered channels and pores (Review). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09687680410001716853
- The paper
- Bayley, H., & Jayasinghe, L. (2004). Functional engineered channels and pores (Review). Molecular Membrane Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687680410001716853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.