Cited by 37Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareHealth and Conflict Studies

“You have to take action”: changing knowledge and attitudes towards newborn care practices during crisis in South Sudan

Open access
Sami, Samira, Kerber, Kate, Tomczyk, Barbara, Amsalu, Ribka, Jackson, Debra, Scudder, Elaine, Dimiti, Alexander, Meyers, Janet +5 more·2017·Reproductive Health Matters

Abstract

Highest rates of neonatal mortality occur in countries that have recently experienced conflict. International Medical Corps implemented a package of newborn interventions in June 2016, based on the Newborn health in humanitarian settings: field guide, targeting community- and facility-based health workers in displaced person camps in South Sudan. We describe health workers' knowledge and attitudes toward newborn health interventions, before and after receiving clinical training and supplies, and recommend dissemination strategies for improved uptake of newborn guidelines during crises. A mixed methods approach was utilised, including pre-post knowledge tests and in-depth interviews. Study participants were community- and facility-based health workers in two internally displaced person camps located in Juba and Malakal and two refugee camps in Maban from March to October 2016. Mean knowledge scores for newborn care practices and danger signs increased among 72 community health workers (pre-training: 5.8 [SD: 2.3] vs. post-training: 9.6 [SD: 2.1]) and 25 facility-based health workers (pre-training: 14.2 [SD: 2.7] vs. post-training: 17.4 [SD: 2.8]). Knowledge and attitudes toward key essential practices, such as the use of partograph to assess labour progress, early initiation of breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care and weighing the baby, improved among skilled birth attendants. Despite challenges in conflict-affected settings, conducting training has the potential to increase health workers' knowledge on neonatal health post-training. The humanitarian community should reinforce this knowledge with key actions to shift cultural norms that expand the care provided to women and their newborns in these contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09688080.2017.1405677

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following training of CHWs and HWs, in South Sudan there was an increase in correct responses by these professionals regarding the identification of newborn danger signs.

    “Following training of CHWs and HWs, in South Sudan there was an increase in correct responses by these professionals regarding the identification of newborn danger signs,53”
  • Evidence from South Sudan shows that training of HWs increased the intention to promote skin-to-skin care.

    “Evidence from South Sudan shows that training of HWs increased the intention to promote skin-to-skin care,53”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 37

Authors
Sami, S., Kerber, K., Tomczyk, B., Amsalu, R., Jackson, D., Scudder, E., Dimiti, A., Meyers, J., Kenneth, K., Kenyi, S., Kennedy, C. E., Ackom, K., & Mullany, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Save the Children (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
  • Director General, Directorate of Reproductive Health, Ministry of Health, Juba, Republic of South Sudan
  • Field Research Coordinator, International Medical Corps, Juba, Republic of South Sudan
  • Senior Health Advisor, International Medical Corps, London, UK.
Corresponding author
Sami, Samira
Venue
Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2017-11-30
Volume
25
Issue
51
Pages
124-139
ISSN
  • 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9576
OpenAlex
W2772815686
Cited by
37
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of the Western Cape Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • The Elma Relief Foundation
  • Save the Children
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
neonatal care, newborn health, humanitarian settings, conflict-affected settings, health worker knowledge and attitudes, community health workers, skilled birth attendants, neonatal danger signs, partograph, early initiation of breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care, displaced persons camps, refugee camps, South Sudan, cultural norms
MeSH terms
South Sudan, Maternal-Child Health Services, Adult, Breast Feeding, Community Health Workers, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Postnatal Care, Quality of Health Care, Refugees, Kangaroo-Mother Care Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review