Cited by 42Decolonial Thought and EpistemologiesPolitical Science Research and EducationAfrican cultural and philosophical studies

Decolonizing the IPE syllabus: Eurocentrism and the coloniality of knowledge in International Political Economy

Mantz, Felix·2019·Review of International Political Economy

Abstract

This pedagogical intervention examines the manifestations of Eurocentrism and the coloniality of knowledge in the teaching of IPE by analyzing an IPE Master’s program of a UK university. Advancing a decolonial reading of this program, I draw on the growing body of decolonial theories critiquing political economy scholarship and teaching. Three points of critique are centered throughout this analysis: (1) economism, (2) the absence of race and (3) the conceptualization of ‘The International’. In addition to identifying how these issues manifest in the IPE course, I suggest ways to address them, illustrating how decolonial pedagogical transformations and epistemic pluriversality can lead to better analytical frameworks, as well as contribute to epistemic and global justice. This intervention begins by outlining the IPE program in question before introducing a decolonial analytical framework that centers the coloniality of knowledge and Eurocentrism. This framework is then mobilized throughout the analysis which is divided into the three points of critique mentioned above. Afterwards, I propose some alternative bodies of knowledge as decolonial options for IPE syllabi and conclude with suggesting further research avenues. This intervention seeks to engage IPE professors and researchers who are interested in or committed to decolonizing IPE syllabi, programs and departments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09692290.2019.1647870

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk of recent critique of IPE's colonial roots comes from two conceptual perspectives: the "blind spots" approach and the Eurocentric theories approach.

    “Thus far, the bulk of the critique has come from roughly two conceptual perspectives. The first is concerned with IPE leaving out issues that are crucial for understanding colonialism, racism, and other topics associated with decolonization (Mantz, 2019; Baumann, 2021). We call this the “blind spots” approach, following Best et al. (Citation2021) and LeBaron et al. (Citation2021).”
  • IPE accounts of the modern global economic order tend to divorce analyses of economic relations from processes of colonialism, imperialism, and slavery.

    “critics in the blind spots camp also argue that IPE accounts of the modern global economic order tend to divorce analyses of economic relations from processes of colonialism, imperialism, and slavery (Mantz, 2019; Bhambra, Citation2021).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mantz, F.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Mantz, Felix
Venue
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2019-08-07
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1361-1378
ISSN
  • 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4526
OpenAlex
W2965519524
Cited by
42
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of International Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › African cultural and philosophical studies
Keywords
international political economy, Eurocentrism, coloniality of knowledge, decolonial pedagogy, syllabus design, economism, the international, global justice, decolonial theory, master's degree curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review