The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The third way and the third world: poverty reduction and social inclusion in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism
Abstract
In the wake of frank neo-liberalism, and in the context of rising security fears, ways are being found to provide market liberalism with a more inclusive face. The Poverty Reduction Strategies currently prominent in international development, and Thirdway OECD ‘Social Inclusion’ policy frames claim common purpose to promote ‘opportunity, empowerment and security’ for people and places on the peripheries of global economies and societies. They share commitments to global economic integration and openness, market led growth, ‘good’ and ‘joined up’ governance, local and social partnerships, and wide-ranging activation of ‘capacities’. But the high rhetorical aspirations of liberalism to social ‘inclusivity’ have so far overreached empirical gains for the poor. Drawing on developing country examples of Poverty Reduction Strategy and public policy in New Zealand’s current Labour government, this paper sketches salient features of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. It critically examines its status as a Polanyian turn within a wider liberal project, which seeks to re-embed and legitimate a liberal social and economic order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
(1985) · Cited by 7,244
Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time
Polanyi, K., Stiglitz, J. E., & Block, F. (1944) · Cited by 6,692
Polanyi, K. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch4 · Cited by 6,208
Powers of freedom: reframing political thought
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3035 · Cited by 5,663
Globalization and Its Discontents
(2015) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Economics and Society · doi:10.4135/9781452206905.n316 · Cited by 5,477
Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization
Wade, R. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691187181 · Cited by 4,835
International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order
Ruggie, J. G. (1982) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300018993 · Cited by 4,463
Cited by
Dorward, A. (2009) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00439.x · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, D., & Craig, D.
- Venue
- Review of International Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 387-423
- ISSN
- 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2141274517
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 66.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The third way and the third world: poverty reduction and social inclusion in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09692290420001672881
- The paper
- Porter, D., & Craig, D. (2004). The third way and the third world: poverty reduction and social inclusion in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290420001672881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.