The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments
Abstract
Validity is the most important quality of an assessment, but its evaluation is often neglected. The step‐by‐step approach suggested here provides structured guidance to validators of educational assessments. Assessment is depicted as a chain of eight linked stages: administration, scoring, aggregation, generalization, extrapolation, evaluation, decision and impact. Evaluating validity requires careful consideration of threats to validity associated with each link. Several threats are described and exemplified for each link. These sets of threats are intended to be illustrative rather than comprehensive. The chain model suggests that validity is limited by the weakest link, and that efforts to make other links particularly strong may be wasteful or even harmful. The chain model and list of threats is also shown to be valuable when planning assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students
Crooks, T. J. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058004438 · Cited by 1,369
Self-citationThe interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments
Messick, S. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023002013 · Cited by 1,315
Cited by
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
Kane, M. T. (2013) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12000 · Cited by 2,110
Self-citationIndeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading
Sadler, D. R. (2009) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930801956059 · Cited by 489
Construct‐Irrelevant Variance in High‐Stakes Testing
Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x · Cited by 386
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Validating score interpretations and uses
Kane, M. (2012) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532211417210 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. T., & Cohen, A. S.
- Venue
- Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-286
- ISSN
- 0969-594X (ISSN-L)
- 1465-329X
- OpenAlex
- W1995633917
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0969594960030302
- The paper
- Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. T., & Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594960030302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.