Cited by 23Science Education and PedagogyEducation in Rural ContextsAfrican Education and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Challenges Encountered in the Teaching and Learning of the Natural Sciences in Rural Schools in South Africa

Mtsi, Nomxolisi, Maphosa, Cosmas·2016·Journal of Social Sciences

Abstract

The study sought to establish challenges encountered by teachers in teaching science in rural junior secondary schools in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Located in the interpretivist paradigm and following a qualitative approach, the study adopted a case study design. A purposive sample of three school principals, three Natural Sciences teachers and eighteen Natural Sciences learners participated in the study. Data were collected through individual interviews with principals and teachers, focus group interviews with learners and lesson observation. Data were analysed for content. The study found that there were numerous challenges related to lack of required infrastructure and resources for science teaching. There were also challenges related to learners’ background, language of instruction and lack of parental support. The study concludes that the teaching and learning of Natural Sciences in rural junior secondary schools is negatively affected by the existence of challenges which should be addressed. It is only after such challenges are addressed that Natural Science can be meaningfully taught and learnt in schools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09718923.2016.11893544

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Amos S, Boohan R 2002.Aspects of Teaching Secondary Science. London: Routledge Falmer. · DOI
  2. Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking RR (Eds.) 2000.HowPeople Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. 2ndEdition. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
  3. Brock-Utne B 2000.Whose Education for All? The Recolonization of the African Mind. New York: farmers Press.
  4. Dudu W 2013.Grade]] Learners’ and Teachers’ Conceptionsof Scientific Inquiry in Relation toInstructional Practices. PhD Thesis. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
  5. Ferreira JG 2011. Teaching Life Sciences to English second language learners: What do teachers do?South African Journal of Education, 31: 102–113. · DOI
  6. Grabe M, Grabe C 2007.Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning. 51h Edition. Boston, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
  7. Idiaghe JE 2004.Relationship between EducationalFacilities, Teachers’ Qualifications, School Location and Academic Performance in Secondary Schoolsin the Delta State. PhD Thesis. Abraka: Delta State University.
  8. Joyce B, Calhoun E, Hopkins D 2000.Models of Learning - Tools for Teaching, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  9. Leedy P, Ormrod J 2013.Practical Research: Planning and Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  10. Makgato M, Mji A 2006. Factors associated with high school learners’ poor performance: A spotlight on mathematics and physical science.South African Journal of Education, 26 (2): 253–266.
  11. Mokiwa HO, Msila V 2013. Teachers’ conceptions of teaching Physical Science in the medium of English: A case study.International Journal of Education Sciences, 5 (1): 55–62. · DOI
  12. Ogunniyi MB, Rollnick M 2015. preservice science teacher education in Africa: Prospects and Challenges.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26 (1): 65–79. · DOI
  13. Reagan T 2003. Critical constructivism and language teaching: New wine in old bottles.Journal for Language Teaching, 37 (1): 120–141. · DOI
  14. Scantlebury K 2012. Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education. In: B J Fraser, KG Tobin, CJ McRobbie (Eds.):Second International Handbook of Science Education. Volume 1. The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 499-512. · DOI
  15. Tan AL, Tan SC 2008. Authority and transmission versus knowledge building: Dilemma in learning science. In: YJ Lee, AL Tan (Eds.):Science Education at the Nexus of Theory and Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 239-251. · DOI
  16. Taylor N, Vinjevold P (Eds.) 1999.Getting LearningRight: Report of the President’s Education InitiativeResearch Project. Johannesburg: The Joint Education Trust
  17. Tobin KG (Ed.) 1990.The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
  18. Trowbridge LW, Bybee RW, Powell JC 2000.Teaching Secondary School Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mtsi, N., & Maphosa, C.
Affiliations
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2016-04
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
58-67
ISSN
0971-8923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769043196
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
  • Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
Keywords
science education, rural schools, junior high school, educational challenges, science teaching resources, school infrastructure, language of instruction, parental support, student background, Eastern Cape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review