The Childhood Trauma and Late Adolescent Rejection Sensitivity
Abstract
The prime aim of this study is to examine the relationship between childhood trauma and rejection sensitivity. The study group comprised of 882 late adolescents (423 female; 459 male) who were studying different major fields at the School of Physical Education and Sports and Faculty of Education in Mugla Sitki Kocman University. Data was collected by using the brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire. Pearson product-moment correlation analysis was employed to search for relationship between childhood trauma and rejection sentivity. The structural equation modeling was also used for explaining rejection sensitivity. It was found that there was a positive relationship between rejection sensitivity and physical abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, and sexual abuse subdimensions of childhood trauma. As a result of the present study, the researcher observed that childhood trauma is an important risk factor to identify in late adolescents with rejection sensitivity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five studies indicated physical abuse significantly correlated with rejection sensitivity.
“Five studies indicated physical abuse significantly correlated with RS (Bungert, Liebke, et al., 2015;Erozkan, 2015;Feldman & Downey, 1994;Hernandez, Trout, & Liu, 2016;Kahya, 2018) and three studies indicated physical neglect correlated significantly (Bungert, Liebke, et al., 2015;Goodman et al., 2014;Kahya, 2018).”
From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Erozkan, 2015
Two studies indicated that sexual abuse did correlate with rejection sensitivity, although the effect was small in the higher quality study.
“Two others indicated that sexual abuse did correlate with RS (Erozkan, 2015), although the effect was small in the higher quality study (Kahya, 2018).”
From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Erozkan, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Erozkan, A.
- Affiliations
- Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Education , Mugla, Turkey
- Venue
- The Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Kamla Raj Enterprises
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-422
- ISSN
- 0972-0073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2187926252
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- childhood trauma, rejection sensitivity, late adolescence, physical abuse, emotional abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, risk factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review