The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turkey and the United States in the twenty-first century: friends or foes?
Open accessAbstract
Turkey and the United States for a long time treated each other as “staunch allies” during the Cold War period. The end of the East–West confrontation, however, heralded the beginning of a new era in Turkish–American relations due to the changing priorities of the long-time allies, which manifested themselves in their policies toward Iraq following the 1991 Gulf War. The divergence of approaches toward the future of the Middle East in general and Iraq in particular in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks aggravated the tension in their bilateral relations. Had it not been for the sake of having an allied history together, “rivalry” would be the term to define the nature of the current state of affairs in Turkish–American relations. The sources of policies which have brought the two countries to the brink of wrangling are discussed in this paper. It is emphasized that the lack of a common security culture is primarily responsible for most of the trouble being encountered in their bilateral relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Amid the revolutionary changes taking place in the Middle East in the context of the so-called Arab Spring, Turkey began to pursue a transformational regional policy; Turkish decision makers appear to have believed that Turkey's hour had finally arrived.”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Amid the revolutionary changes taking place in the Middle East in the context of the so-called Arab Spring, Turkey began to pursue a transformational regional policy; Turkish decision makers appear to have believed that Turkey's hour had finally arrived.”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modernity, Secularism and Islam
Keyman, E. F. (2007) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276407075008 · Cited by 139
Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking 'What If?'
Mythen, G., & Walklate, S. (2008) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010608088776 · Cited by 112
The Possibilities and Limits of Turkey's Soft Power in the Middle East
Altunışık, M. B. (2008) · OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · Cited by 90
“Only Strong States Can Survive in Turkey's Geography”: The uses of “geopolitical truths” in Turkey
Bilgin, P. (2007) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.04.003 · Cited by 87
The United States: A Normative Power?Preprint
Hamilton, D. S. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337602 · Cited by 20
Reexamining the U.S.-Turkish Alliance
Walker, J. W. (2007) · The Washington Quarterly · doi:10.1162/wash.2007.31.1.93 · Cited by 13
Gordon, P. H. (2007) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396330701733894 · Cited by 9
Rethinking the Battle of Ideas: How the United States Can Help Muslim Moderates
Krebs, R. R. (2008) · Orbis · doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2008.01.010 · Cited by 8
Turkey's Fading Dream of Europe
Taşpınar, Ö. (2007) · Current History · doi:10.1525/curh.2007.106.698.123 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [4]4. Robert Kagan, ''Power and Weakness: Why the United States and Europe See the World Differently,'' Policy Review, JuneÁJuly 2002.
- [17]17. Among those who put forward similar arguments, Dimitri Trenin from the Carnegie Endowment's Moscow office expressed these views during the working group sessions of the Black Sea Security Conference held in Bucharest, Romania in February 2006.
Cited by
Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order
OĞUZLU, H. T. (2019) · All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace · doi:10.20991/allazimuth.464076 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Kibaroglu, M., & Oguzlu, T.
- Venue
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-382
- ISSN
- 1016-3271 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-4641
- OpenAlex
- W2051039986
- Semantic Scholar
- 5347757aef41fd71492e367ab04dabbd63dc46ee
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Turkey's Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Turkish Studies
- Keywords
- Turkey–United States relations, 1991 Gulf War, Iraq policy, post-9/11 security policy, Middle East security, security culture, Cold War legacy, US foreign policy toward Turkey, Turkish foreign policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
