The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections
Abstract
Museums make their collections available online to keep pace with developments in how people access and share information. While museums have traditionally understood the notion of public access as part of their institutional remit, in this paper I draw on policy documents and qualitative interviews with Australasian cultural professionals, to examine how the discourse of access might account for the museum’s transformation from a community space to a resource that is beneficial to marketers. I use Google Arts & Culture as a case study, to suggest the terms of public access have altered to adapt to the needs of commercial “digital enclosures.” When people engage with the museum in virtual spaces data are collected. Algorithms work as a set of instructions that make it possible to search, sort and organise the data, linking together people and their online practices in order to enact a form of algorithmic cultural recommendation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but they also encode a particular vision of how cultural memory should be organized, displayed, and circulated, reflecting a technocentric logic often at odds with how the cultural heritage sector has functioned for decades (Giannachi, 2016;Marcum & Schonfeld, 2021;Wilson-Barnao, 2017).”
From From platform governance to institutional practice: Experimentation, misalignment, and contingent adoption of Google Arts & Culture (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson-Barnao, 2017
In the citing paper
“In other words, the risk of datafication and commercialization of cultural heritage collections (Mejias & Couldry, 2019;van Dijck, 2014;Wilson-Barnao, 2017) was understood by institutions as an inevitable”
From From platform governance to institutional practice: Experimentation, misalignment, and contingent adoption of Google Arts & Culture (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson-Barnao, 2017
In the citing paper
“While the platform's FAQ states it will not”
From From platform governance to institutional practice: Experimentation, misalignment, and contingent adoption of Google Arts & Culture (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson-Barnao, 2017
Citations
Cites
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1×
“…cultural control inviting people to log on, engage and share favourite works with friends, the information provider presents itself as impartial and objective to what its users do with the content it provides without making clear how it profits (or intends to) from its involvement (Gillespie 2010).”
BackgroundThe Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics
Handler, R. (1996) · Museum Anthropology · doi:10.1525/mua.1996.20.2.76 · Cited by 1,533
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Bucher, T. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812440159 · Cited by 1,289
Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content
van Dijck, J. (2009) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443708098245 · Cited by 1,269
Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self
Ajzenstadt, M., Menzies, R., & Rose, N. (1991) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341282 · Cited by 1,111
Gillespie, T. (2014) · Media Technologies · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0013 · Cited by 1,016
Surveillance studies: an overview
Kelly, T. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · Cited by 947
Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters
Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2017) · Computer Ethics · doi:10.4324/9781315259697-19 · Cited by 708
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Andrejevic Mark., 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673
- Couldry Nick, 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1710
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray Richard., 2015, Daily Mail Australia
- 10.1080/01972240050133634 · DOI
- Kent Allen, 2000, Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science
- Manovich Lev., 2010, Museums in a Digital Age, 64
- Pearce Susan., 1986, Museums Journal, 85, 198
- Pulh Mathilde, 2015, International Journal of Arts Management, 18, 43
- Rogers Richard., 2009, Deep Search: The Politics of Search Engines, 12
Cited by
Airoldi, M., & Rokka, J. (2022) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726 · Cited by 111
Cao, T. L. (2025) · Platforms & Society · doi:10.1177/29768624251349092 · Cited by 5
Cao, T. L. (2026) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565261431167
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson-Barnao, C.
- Affiliations
- School of Communication and Arts, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
- Venue
- Consumption Markets & Culture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06-13
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559-574
- ISSN
- 1025-3866
- 1477-223X
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 47
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10253866.2017.1331910
- The paper
- Wilson-Barnao, C. (2017). How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections. Consumption Markets & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2017.1331910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.