Cited by 4Stress Responses and CortisolMenstrual Health and DisordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Impact of the menstrual cycle phases and time of day on markers of stress: salivary α-amylase and secretory immunoglobulin A

Open access
Walker, Josey K., Dillard, Courtney C., Gonzalez, Drew E., Waldman, Hunter S., McAllister, Matthew J.·2025·Stress

Abstract

Previous reports suggest that the menstrual cycle (MC) phases can impact cortisol concentrations. However, research is needed on whether the MC impacts other markers of stress and immune function. It has also been shown that some biomarkers are impacted by time of day, although differences between morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) biomarkers have not been studied over the course of the MC. This study assessed the effect of MC phases and time of day on salivary stress biomarkers [salivary α-amylase (sAA), secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA)], progesterone, resting blood pressure and resting heart rate (RHR). A single-group repeated measure design was employed in which seventeen participants (n = 17) monitored their MC for two months while attending eight experimental sessions which included both AM and PM sessions during each predicted 1) menses, 2) follicular, 3) ovulatory and 4) luteal phases. Resting blood pressures, heart rates, body composition parameters (assessed via bioelectrical impedance analysis), sAA and SIgA concentrations were assessed. No time of day x MC phase interactions (p > 0.05) were noted for sAA or SIgA, resting blood pressure, heart rate, or body composition parameters. However, sAA and RHR were significantly higher in the PM, while SIgA was significantly higher in the AM. These data suggest that the MC phases do not impact sAA or SIgA, resting blood pressure, heart rates, or body composition parameters. However, time-of-day impacts RHR and concentrations of sAA and SIgA. These findings provide implications for female participants in research dealing with these biomarkers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10253890.2024.2449098

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 4

Authors
Walker, J. K., Dillard, C. C., Gonzalez, D. E., Waldman, H. S., & McAllister, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas State University (US)
  • University of North Alabama (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
McAllister, Matthew J.
Venue
Stress
Published
2025-01-05
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
2449098-2449098
ISSN
  • 1025-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-8888
OpenAlex
W4406108995
Cited by
4
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stress (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
menstrual cycle phases, time of day, salivary amylase, secretory IgA, stress biomarkers, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, progesterone, body composition, luteal phase, ovulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, Menstrual Cycle, Progesterone, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Salivary alpha-Amylases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review