Cited by 69Isotope Analysis in EcologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesMarine and fisheries research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stable Isotopes in Animal Ecology: The Effect of Ration Size on the Trophic Shift of C and N Isotopes Between Feed and Carcass

Focken, U.·2001·Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies

Abstract

The feeding ecology of living or extinct animal species is now frequently studied by analysis of stable isotope ratios in small quantities of carcass or remains such as bones or teeth. Although there are numerous papers on these applications in natural systems, the theoretical and experimental basis of this method is weak. In order to evaluate the effect of different feeding levels on the carbon and nitrogen trophic shift, an experiment was carried out in which fish (Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, initial weight 40.8 g) were fed for 4 weeks at three levels from slightly above maintenance to almost satiation. For each treatment, three fish were reared individually. The isotopic ratios of carbon and nitrogen in feeds and fish carcasses were determined and in the case of carbon this was done separately for lipids and lipid-free matter. The trophic shift was calculated at each feeding level from the delta13C and delta15N ratios of feed and fish. There was a significant trend towards higher values for the trophic shift at higher feeding rates in all fractions analysed. Although further research is required, it can be concluded that the effect of feeding level cannot be ignored when the diet of an animal has to be calculated from the ratios of isotopes in its body.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10256010108033296

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Froese R., 2001, Fish Base
  2. Santiago C. B., 2001, Energy Metabolism in Animals, 487

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Focken, U.
Affiliations
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Focken, U.
Venue
Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies
Published
2001-11
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
199-211
ISSN
  • 1025-6016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2639
OpenAlex
W2076049544
Cited by
69
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
stable isotopes, trophic changes, feeding level, Oreochromis niloticus, carbon isotopes, nitrogen isotopes, lipid fractions, diet reconstruction
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Isotopes, Diet, Environmental Monitoring, Nitrogen Isotopes, Tissue Distribution, Tilapia, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review