Cited by 157Nutritional Studies and DietFatty Acid Research and HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern is inversely associated with depression, anxiety and psychological distress

Sadeghi, Omid, Keshteli, Ammar Hassanzadeh, Afshar, Hamid, Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad, Adibi, Peyman·2021·Nutritional Neuroscience

Abstract

Background: Few studies have assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet in relation to psychological health, in particular in the Middle East.Objective: To examine the association between adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern and prevalence of psychological disorders among a large population of Iranian adults.Design: In this cross-sectional study on 3172 Iranian adults aged 18–55 years, we used a validated food frequency questionnaire for the assessment of dietary intakes. Adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern was examined using the Trichopoulou et al. method. To assess psychological health, the Iranian validated version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used. Psychological distress was assessed through the use of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ).Results: Mean age of study participants was 36.54 ± 4.97 years. After controlling for potential confounders, participants with the greatest adherence to the Mediterranean diet had lower odds for depression (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46–0.78), anxiety (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42–0.86) and psychological distress (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45–0.79) compared with those with the lowest adherence. When the association with components of Mediterranean diet was examined, we found that high intake of fruits and vegetables was associated with a lower odds of depression, anxiety and psychological distress. In contrast, high intake of grains was positively associated with depression, anxiety and psychological distress.Conclusion: We found evidence indicating an inverse association between adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern and odds of psychological disorders including depression, anxiety and psychological distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1028415x.2019.1620425

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 157

Authors
Sadeghi, O., Keshteli, A. H., Afshar, H., Esmaillzadeh, A., & Adibi, P.
Affiliations
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Keshteli, Ammar Hassanzadeh
Venue
Nutritional Neuroscience
Published
2019-06-11
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
248-259
ISSN
  • 1028-415X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8305
OpenAlex
W2949207149
Cited by
157
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutritional Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Mediterranean diet, dietary adherence, depression, anxiety, psychological distress, fruit and vegetable intake, grain consumption, Iranian adults, mental health
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Iran, Male, Middle Aged, Diet, Mediterranean, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review