Stabilisation of lithomargic clay using alkali activated fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag
Abstract
A suitable ground improvement technique is essential in order to confront the problems associated with lithomargic clay for road construction. The efficacy of alkaline solutions such as sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate along with class F fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) as additives to improve the properties of lithomargic clay is examined. The different mixes are prepared by replacing the soil with 20%, 30%, and 40% of GGBS and fly ash. The Maximum Dry Density (MDD) obtained from the soil replaced with 40% GGBS and for the soil replaced with 30% fly ash. An activator modulus of 1.25 is kept constant for the varying sodium oxide dosage at 2, 3 and 4 per cent. The Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) of the alkali-activated soil cured for 3, 7 and 28 days is determined and compared with the UCS of the soil replaced with fly ash and GGBS at both standard and modified proctor densities. The different mixes are tested for the durability, California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The soil is replaced with GGBS and fly ash does not pass the durability test while the alkali-activated mixes with 4% sodium oxide dosage is found to be durable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chemical stabilization processes such as mixing with GGBFS and fly ash by-products can alter the compressive strength, swelling potential, and volume change properties of soil.
“It is possible to alter the compressive strength, swelling potential, and volume change properties of soil through chemical stabilization processes such as mixing with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and fly ash by-products, as well as mixes of any of these materials [39,40,41,42,43].”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Geopolymers have outstanding engineering properties, such as increased strength and improved soil adhesion.
“Geopolymers have outstanding engineering properties, such as increased strength and improved soil adhesion [36,40,56].”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdila, S. R., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Ahmad, R., Burduhos Nergis, D. D., Rahim, S. Z. A., Omar, M. F., Sandu, A. V., Vizureanu, P., & Syafwandi (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15010375 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amulya, S., Ravi Shankar, A. U., & Praveen, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN)
- Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India
- Corresponding author
- Amulya, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Pavement Engineering
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1114-1121
- ISSN
- 1029-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-268X
- OpenAlex
- W2892245003
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Pavement Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- soil stabilization, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio, durability, maximum dry density, road subgrade improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review