Cited by 28Teacher Professional Development and MotivationSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceOccupational Health and Burnout

The Influence of Support from Administrators and Other Work Conditions on Special Education Teachers

Aldosiry, Norah·2022·International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

Abstract

Using a national sample (n = 343), this study examined the importance and the amount of administrative support special education teachers (SETs) receive and its effect on teachers’ intent to continue teaching, stress, job satisfaction and school commitment. This study also used regression analysis to determine if factors such as years of experience, range of disabilities, school level and caseload can predict stress, satisfaction and commitment. The results indicate that SETs deem all dimensions of administrative support as important. However, teachers rated emotional and appraisal support as more important and often received from administrators than informational and instrumental support. Administrative support plays an important role in reducing stress, satisfaction, commitment and intent to stay. Teachers with higher levels of administrative support are less stressed, more satisfied, have a higher level of commitment and intend to continue teaching. Years of experience and range of disabilities are also significant predictors of stress, satisfaction and school commitment. Teachers who teach defined disability or have more years of experience have lower levels of stress and higher levels of satisfaction and school commitment compared to those who teach students with differing disabilities or are less experienced. Caseload and school level appeared to be nonsignificant predictors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1034912x.2020.1837353

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Special needs education teachers would experience less stress, increased satisfaction, and greater commitment due to a higher level of administrative support.

    “This finding supports the study by Aldosiry (2020), which suggests that special needs education teachers would experience less stress, increased satisfaction, and greater commitment due to a higher level of administrative support.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldosiry, N.
Affiliations
King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Aldosiry, Norah
Venue
International Journal of Disability, Development and Education
Published
2020-10-25
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
1873-1887
ISSN
  • 1034-912X (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-346X
OpenAlex
W3094252824
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Disability Development and Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
special education teachers, administrative support, teacher stress, job satisfaction, school commitment, teacher retention, emotional support, appraisal support, information support, instrumental support, years of experience, caseloads, school level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review