The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A "Small-World" Network Model of Cognitive Insight
Open accessAbstract
Despite many decades of study, scientists still puzzle over the process of insight. By what mechanism does a person experience that "Aha!" moment, when sudden clarity emerges from a tangled web of thoughts and ideas? This research integrates psychological work on insight with graph theoretic work on "small-world" phenomenon, to construct a theory that explains how insight occurs, how it is similar to and different from more typical learning processes, and why it yields an affective response in the individual. I propose that cognitive insight occurs when an atypical association, forged through random recombination or directed search, results in a "shortcut" in an individual's network of representations. This causes a rapid decrease in path length, reorients the individual's understanding of the relationships within and among the affected representations, and can prompt a cascade of other connections. This result is demonstrated by applying graph theoretical analysis to network translations of commonly used insight problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Duncker, K. (1945) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093599 · Cited by 2,938
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4 · Cited by 2,552 · cited 2×
“The participants solve the problem (split up the rays/army into smaller units and send them to the tumor/fortress by multiple paths) by mapping the military solution to the tumor problem (Duncker, 1945; Gick & Holyoak, 1980).”
BackgroundMethodBlind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes
Campbell, D. T. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040373 · Cited by 2,329
Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon
Watts, D. J. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210318 · Cited by 1,510
Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung.
Luchins, A. S. (1942) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093502 · Cited by 1,143
Raskin, E. (1936) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060483 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240474 · Cited by 1,457
The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0695 · Cited by 874
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 · Cited by 659
Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons
Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407 · Cited by 392
Cognitive insight: a systematic review.
Van Camp, L. S. C., Sabbe, B. G. C., & Oldenburg, J. F. E. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.011 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilling, M. A.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 131-154
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W2145879540
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A "Small-World" Network Model of Cognitive Insight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10400419.2005.9651475
- The paper
- Schilling, M. A. (2005). A "Small-World" Network Model of Cognitive Insight. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2005.9651475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
