Accessibility to digital technology: Virtual barriers, real opportunities
Open accessAbstract
The potential of digital technology to assist persons with disabilities has always been known. The capabilities of digital devices have been improving so impressively for so long, that the assumption that in parallel the same is happening with accessibility is common. Unfortunately, accessibility for persons with disabilities is neither certain nor constant, and in fact, a conscious and systemic effort is required to ensure that the potential of digital technologies for inclusion is realized.Digital accessibility is best understood as a chain of dependencies where training, hardware, software, content, and standards must work together harmoniously, and each of these elements must be understood as a dynamic process. For example, smartphones can be incompatible with hearing aids required by the deaf, touch screens too sensitive for those with motor impairments, and web pages often lack the text labels needed by screen reading software used by the blind. Even if each of these examples is fixed, the accessibility may be short lived if the production process behind that hardware or software was not corrected, as the digital world is constantly being updated. Training, hardware design, software development, content production, and standards definition processes, must be pursued taking accessibility and affordability into account.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Botelho, F. H. F.
- Affiliations
- United Nations Children's Fund (US)
- Corresponding author
- Botelho, Fernando H. F.
- Venue
- Assistive Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-12-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 1040-0435 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3614
- OpenAlex
- W4200614389
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 24.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Assistive Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UNICEF (UATY-2021-C6821)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- digital accessibility, people with disabilities, inclusion, accessibility standards, screen readers, hearing aids, motor impairment, touch screen, web accessibility, affordability, accessibility training, assistive technology development
- MeSH terms
- Computers, Equipment Design, Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Aids, Humans, Software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review