“It’s just not the culture”: A qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback.
Open accessAbstract
Phenomenon: Competency-based medical education requires ongoing performance-based feedback for professional growth. In several studies, medical trainees report that the quality of faculty feedback is inadequate. Sociocultural barriers to feedback exchanges are further amplified in graduate and postgraduate medical education settings, where trainees serve as frontline providers of patient care. Factors that affect institutional feedback culture, enhance feedback seeking, acceptance, and bidirectional feedback warrant further exploration in these settings. APPROACH: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we sought to examine residents' perspectives on institutional factors that affect the quality of feedback, factors that influence receptivity to feedback, and quality and impact of faculty feedback. Four focus group discussions were conducted, with two investigators present at each. One facilitated the discussion, and the other observed the interactions and took field notes. We audiotaped and transcribed the discussions, and performed a thematic analysis. Measures to ensure rigor included thick descriptions, independent coding by two investigators, and attention to reflexivity. FINDINGS: We identified five key themes, dominated by resident perceptions regarding the influence of institutional feedback culture. The theme labels are taken from direct participant quotes: (a) the cultural norm lacks clear expectations and messages around feedback, (b) the prevailing culture of niceness does not facilitate honest feedback, (c) bidirectional feedback is not part of the culture, (d) faculty-resident relationships impact credibility and receptivity to feedback, and (e) there is a need to establish a culture of longitudinal professional growth. Insights: Institutional culture could play a key role in influencing the quality, credibility, and acceptability of feedback. A polite culture promotes a positive learning environment but can be a barrier to honest feedback. Feedback initiatives focusing solely on techniques of feedback giving may not enhance meaningful feedback. Further research on factors that promote feedback seeking, receptivity to constructive feedback, and bidirectional feedback would provide valuable insights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., Katz, J. T., & van der Vleuten, C.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Education Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Ramani, Subha
- Venue
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-21
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-161
- ISSN
- 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8015
- OpenAlex
- W2562562852
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback culture, institutional culture, instructor feedback, resident perceptions, bidirectional feedback, feedback receptivity, competency-based medical education, graduate medical education, feedback seeking
- MeSH terms
- Formative Feedback, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Internship and Residency, Organizational Culture, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review