Cited by 138Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

“It’s just not the culture”: A qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback.

Open access
Ramani, Subha, Post, Sarah E., Könings, Karen, Mann, Karen, Katz, Joel T., van der Vleuten, Cees·2017·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

Phenomenon: Competency-based medical education requires ongoing performance-based feedback for professional growth. In several studies, medical trainees report that the quality of faculty feedback is inadequate. Sociocultural barriers to feedback exchanges are further amplified in graduate and postgraduate medical education settings, where trainees serve as frontline providers of patient care. Factors that affect institutional feedback culture, enhance feedback seeking, acceptance, and bidirectional feedback warrant further exploration in these settings. APPROACH: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we sought to examine residents' perspectives on institutional factors that affect the quality of feedback, factors that influence receptivity to feedback, and quality and impact of faculty feedback. Four focus group discussions were conducted, with two investigators present at each. One facilitated the discussion, and the other observed the interactions and took field notes. We audiotaped and transcribed the discussions, and performed a thematic analysis. Measures to ensure rigor included thick descriptions, independent coding by two investigators, and attention to reflexivity. FINDINGS: We identified five key themes, dominated by resident perceptions regarding the influence of institutional feedback culture. The theme labels are taken from direct participant quotes: (a) the cultural norm lacks clear expectations and messages around feedback, (b) the prevailing culture of niceness does not facilitate honest feedback, (c) bidirectional feedback is not part of the culture, (d) faculty-resident relationships impact credibility and receptivity to feedback, and (e) there is a need to establish a culture of longitudinal professional growth. Insights: Institutional culture could play a key role in influencing the quality, credibility, and acceptability of feedback. A polite culture promotes a positive learning environment but can be a barrier to honest feedback. Feedback initiatives focusing solely on techniques of feedback giving may not enhance meaningful feedback. Further research on factors that promote feedback seeking, receptivity to constructive feedback, and bidirectional feedback would provide valuable insights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 138

Authors
Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., Katz, J. T., & van der Vleuten, C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Education Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Ramani, Subha
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
153-161
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2562562852
Cited by
138
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
feedback culture, institutional culture, instructor feedback, resident perceptions, bidirectional feedback, feedback receptivity, competency-based medical education, graduate medical education, feedback seeking
MeSH terms
Formative Feedback, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Internship and Residency, Organizational Culture, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review