The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trace Determination of Mercury: A Review
Abstract
Methods used for trace (sub-ppm) detection of mercury are reviewed. Included are spectrometric methods such as atomic absorption, fluorescence, emission, and mass spectrometry; electrochemical methods; and as radiometric methods as well as other common and novel techniques. Limits of detection are reported where given, and advantages and disadvantages are compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Costley, C. T., Mossop, K. F., Dean, J. R., Garden, L. M., Marshall, J., & Carroll, J. (2000) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00742-4 · Cited by 305
Li, Z., Xia, S., Wang, J., Bian, C., & Tong, J. (2016) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.061 · Cited by 63
Hui, Y., Xiong, C., Bian, C., Gui, S., Tong, J., Li, Y., Gao, C., Huang, Y., Tang, W. C., & Xia, S. (2019) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c9ay00029a · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Clevenger, W. L., Smith, B. W., & Winefordner, J. D.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 1040-8347 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6510
- OpenAlex
- W2005904263
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trace Determination of Mercury: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408349708050578
- The paper
- Clevenger, W. L., Smith, B. W., & Winefordner, J. D. (1997). Trace Determination of Mercury: A Review. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408349708050578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
