The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CD44 in Cancer
Abstract
CD44 is a multistructural and multifunctional cell surface molecule involved in cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell migration, angiogenesis, presentation of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors to the corresponding receptors, and docking of proteases at the cell membrane, as well as in signaling for cell survival. All these biological properties are essential to the physiological activities of normal cells, but they are also associated with the pathologic activities of cancer cells. Experiments in animals have shown that targeting of CD44 by antibodies, antisense,and CD44-soluble proteins markedly reduces the malignant activities of various neoplasms, stressing the therapeutic potential of anti-CD44 agents. Furthermore, because alternative splicing and posttranslational modifications generate many different CD44 sequences, including, perhaps, tumor-specific sequences, the production of anti-CD44 tumor-specific agents may be a realistic therapeutic approach. However, in many cancers (renal cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas are exceptions), a high level of CD44 expression is not always associated with an unfavorable outcome. On the contrary, in some neoplams CD44 upregulation is associated with a favorable outcome. Even worse, in many cases different research grows analyzing the same neoplastic disease reached contradictory conclusions regarding the correlation between CD44 expression and disease prognosis, possibly due to differences in methodology. These problems must be resolved before applying anti-CD44 therapy to human cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extracellular matrix structure
Theocharis, A. D., Skandalis, S. S., Gialeli, C., & Karamanos, N. K. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001 · Cited by 2,598
The biology and role of CD44 in cancer progression: Therapeutic implications
Chen, C., Zhao, S., Karnad, A., & Freeman, J. W. (2018) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-018-0605-5 · Cited by 1,245
Misra, S., Hascall, V. C., Markwald, R. R., & Ghatak, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00201 · Cited by 830
Matrix metalloproteinases in the brain and blood–brain barrier: Versatile breakers and makers
Rempe, R. G., Hartz, A. M., & Bauer, B. (2016) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x16655551 · Cited by 721
Variation in alternative splicing across human tissues
Yeo, G., Holste, D., Kreiman, G., & Burge, C. B. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74 · Cited by 584
Metadata
- Authors
- Naor, D., Nedvetzki, S., Golan, I., Melnik, L., & Faitelson, Y.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 527-579
- ISSN
- 1040-8363 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-781X
- OpenAlex
- W2137103099
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CD44 in Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408360290795574
- The paper
- Naor, D., Nedvetzki, S., Golan, I., Melnik, L., & Faitelson, Y. (2002). CD44 in Cancer. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360290795574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.