Cited by 92Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFood and Agricultural SciencesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Brassica Foods as a Dietary Source of Vitamin C: A Review

Domínguez-Perles, R., Mena, P., García-Viguera, C., Moreno, D. A.·2014·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Brassica genus includes known horticultural vegetables with major economical importance worldwide, and involves vegetables of economical importance being part of the diet and source of oils for industry in many countries. Brassicales own a broad array of health-promoting compounds, emphasized as healthy rich sources of vitamin C. The adequate management of pre- and postharvest factors including crop varieties, growth conditions, harvesting, handling, storage, and final consumer operations would lead to increase or preserve of the vitamin C content or reduced losses by interfering in the catalysis mechanisms that remains largely unknown, and should be reviewed. Likewise, the importance of the food matrix on the absorption and metabolism of vitamin C is closely related to the range of the health benefits attributed to its intake. However, less beneficial effects were derived when purified compounds were administered in comparison to the ingestion of horticultural products such as Brassicas, which entail a closely relation between this food matrix and the bioavailability of its content in vitamin C. This fact should be here also discussed. These vegetables of immature flowers or leaves are used as food stuffs all over the world and represent a considerable part of both western and non-Western diets, being inexpensive crops widely spread and reachable to all social levels, constituting an important source of dietary vitamin C, which may work synergistically with the wealth of bioactive compounds present in these foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2011.626873

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 92

Authors
Domínguez-Perles, R., Mena, P., García-Viguera, C., & Moreno, D. A.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2014-01
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
1076-1091
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2024122949
Cited by
92
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
Brassica, vitamin C, dietary sources of vitamin C, vitamin C content, vitamin C loss, food matrix, bioavailability, bioactive compounds, leafy vegetables, synergistic effect
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Ascorbic Acid, Biological Availability, Brassica, Cooking, Diet, Environment, Food Handling, Health Promotion, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritive Value, Species Specificity, Food Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review