The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo and in vitro models of the human colonic flora
Abstract
The study of colonic flora composition and metabolism presents considerable methodological problems. Attempts to circumvent these problems have led to the development of numerous in vitro and in vivo models to simulate the human colon and its microbial population. In terms of in vivo models, conventional laboratory animals have many limitations. Data of greater relevance to man can be obtained by using germ-free rodents associated with human colonic bacteria. The applications of such animals to studies of toxicity of chemicals and gastrointestinal infections are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of the various in vitro systems for studying gut microflora and its metabolic activity (from simple static cultures to the more sophisticated continuous and semicontinuous flow models) are reviewed. The apparatus involved is described together with practical information on media, running conditions, and sampling. The bacteriological and metabolic criteria for establishing the similarity of the models to the in situ colonic flora are also discussed. The final sections of the review are devoted to the major applications (current and future) of the models, including fermentation studies on dietary fiber, metabolism of nutrients and foreign compounds (including carcinogens) in food, and the investigation of colonization resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Diet and Lactobacillus acidophilus Supplements on Human Fecal Bacterial Enzymes23
Goldin, B. R., Swenson, L., Dwyer, J., Sexton, M., & Gorbach, S. L. (1980) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/64.2.255 · Cited by 286
Contribution of the microflora to proteolysis in the human large intestine
Macfarlane, G. T., Allison, C., Gibson, S. A. W., & Cummings, J. H. (1988) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb02427.x · Cited by 237
Cited by
The gastrointestinal microbiota as a site for the biotransformation of drugs
Sousa, T., Paterson, R., Moore, V., Carlsson, A., Abrahamsson, B., & Basit, A. W. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.07.009 · Cited by 618
Methods of in vitro toxicology
Eisenbrand, G., Pool-Zobel, B., Baker, V, Balls, M., Blaauboer, B. J., Boobis, A., Carere, A., Kevekordes, S., Lhuguenot, J.-C., Pieters, R., et al. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00118-1 · Cited by 462
Colonic metabolites of berry polyphenols: the missing link to biological activity?
Williamson, G., & Clifford, M. N. (2010) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114510003946 · Cited by 462
Minekus, M., Smeets-Peeters, M., Bernalier, A., Marol-Bonnin, S., Havenaar, R., Marteau, P., Alric, M., Fonty, G., & Huis in't Veld, J. H. J. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051622 · Cited by 458
Gut instincts: Explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery
McConnell, E. L., Fadda, H. M., & Basit, A. W. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.05.012 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Rumney, C. J., & Rowland, I. R.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 299-331
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2175870261
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo and in vitro models of the human colonic flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408399209527575
- The paper
- Rumney, C. J., & Rowland, I. R. (1992). In vivo and in vitro models of the human colonic flora. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399209527575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.